• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ULTRAFLEX TRACHEOBRONCHIAL; PROSTHESIS, TRACHEAL, EXPANDABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ULTRAFLEX TRACHEOBRONCHIAL; PROSTHESIS, TRACHEAL, EXPANDABLE Back to Search Results
Model Number M00564810
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 03/12/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).A deployed ultraflex tracheobronchial covered stent was received for analysis; the delivery system and the deployment suture were not returned.Visual examination of the returned device found the stent was received deployed and expanded.The green stent retention suture was broken at one side.No other issues were noted.Based on the details of the reported event and the condition of the returned device, it is possible that excessive force was applied to the stent while handling during preparation or unpacking, which may have resulted in the damage identified during product analysis.Taking all available information into consideration, the investigation concluded that the observed failure was likely due to interaction between the user and device, or sample, caused or contributed to the error.Therefore, the most probable root cause is unintended use error caused or contributed to event.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed and confirmed that this device met all material, assembly and performance specifications at the time of release for distribution.A labeling review was performed, and from the information available this device was used per the directions for use (dfu) / product label.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an ultraflex tracheobronchial covered distal release stent was to be used to treat a malignant airway stenosis during an airway stenting procedure performed on (b)(6) 2019.Reportedly, the patient's anatomy was tortuous.According to the complainant, during preparation, the physician found that the proximal string was broken before the stent released.The stent had never been advanced into the patient's body.Another ultraflex tracheobronchial stent was used to complete the procedure.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be stable.Note: this event has been deemed an mdr reportable event based on investigation results which revealed the green stent retention suture was broken at one side.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ULTRAFLEX TRACHEOBRONCHIAL
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, TRACHEAL, EXPANDABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC IRELAND LIMITED
ballybrit business park
galway
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
carole morley
300 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834015
MDR Report Key8716082
MDR Text Key148567491
Report Number3005099803-2019-03125
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JCT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
K012883
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/20/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/20/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/06/2019
Device Model NumberM00564810
Device Catalogue Number6481
Device Lot Number0020364645
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/29/2019
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/29/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/10/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age42 YR
Patient Weight68
-
-