Catalog Number M490007 |
Device Problem
Fail-Safe Did Not Operate (4046)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 05/31/2019 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The hardware investigation has begun but it has not been completed at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted.Manufacturer's ref.# (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a patient underwent a supraventricular tachycardia (svt) ablation procedure with a smartablate¿ system rf generator and a high temperature issue occurred.It was reported that 35 watts with 55 degree cutoff was programmed on the smartablate¿ system rf generator.The caller stated that the catheter temperature would get to 62 degrees without alarming.The smartablate¿ system rf generator did not alarm or cut off when the temp exceeded the programmed cut off, however, the doctor did come off immediately and discontinued ablation.There were no patient consequences.This issue of the temperature rising above the cut-off temperature limit without alarming has been assessed as an mdr reportable malfunction.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
On 10/21/2019, it was noticed that the manufacture date was incorrectly reported in the 3500a initial mdr as 6/22/2019.The correct date of manufacture is 9/22/2015 and device manufacture date has been updated accordingly.Manufacturer's ref # (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
It was reported that a patient underwent a supraventricular tachycardia (svt) ablation procedure with a smartablate¿ system rf generator and a high temperature issue occurred.It was reported that 35 watts with 55 degree cutoff was programmed on the smartablate¿ system rf generator.The caller stated that the catheter temperature would get to 62 degrees without alarming.The smartablate¿ system rf generator did not alarm or cut off when the temp exceeded the programmed cut off, however, the doctor did come off immediately and discontinued ablation.There were no patient consequences.Device evaluation details: the device was evaluated and no error is found.Device performed within specification.The device was subjected to preventative maintenance, safety and functional testing and all tests passed.No malfunction was found with the device.Complaint was not confirmed; therefore, a manufacturing record evaluation is not required.Manufacturer¿s ref # (b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|