• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION UPHOLD LITE; MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC, FOR PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE, TRANSVAGIN

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION UPHOLD LITE; MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC, FOR PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE, TRANSVAGIN Back to Search Results
Model Number M0068318170
Device Problems Device-Device Incompatibility (2919); Material Twisted/Bent (2981); Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 05/16/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Investigation of the returned uphold lite with/ capio slim revealed that there were no issues found on the capio slim device.The mesh assembly was received in three pieces, and there were signs of use.The mesh appeared to be torn on one side and the other leg was significantly curled.There was residue and debris in the mesh material.The leader loops were cut in the dilator assemblies from the mesh consistent with normal procedure.Additionally, the dart from one of the detached dilator assemblies was loaded into the delivery device and deployed with no issue.A review of the device history record (dhr) confirmed that the device met all material, assembly, and product specifications at the time of release to distribution.Based on the condition of the returned device, it is likely that operational factors lead to the user encountering difficulty during the final adjustments and mesh placement that lead to the subsequent removal of the device.Therfore, the investigation concluded that the most probable cause for this event is adverse event related to procedure, which indicates that the adverse event occurred during the procedure and the device had no influence on event.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an uphold lite with capio slim device was used during an anterior prolapse repair with uphold lite procedure performed on (b)(6) 2019.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the physician had difficulty loading the suture in the capio carrier.The procedure was completed with another uphold lite with capio slim.There was no serious injury reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be stable and fine.This event has been deemed reportable based on the investigation results: the mesh appeared to be torn on one side.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UPHOLD LITE
Type of Device
MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC, FOR PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE, TRANSVAGIN
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
FREUDENBERG MEDICAL
2301 centennial boulevard
jefferson IN 47130
Manufacturer Contact
carole morley
300 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834015
MDR Report Key8772412
MDR Text Key150436661
Report Number3005099803-2019-03385
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OTP
UDI-Device Identifier08714729839200
UDI-Public08714729839200
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeTW
PMA/PMN Number
K122459
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/09/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/09/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/04/2020
Device Model NumberM0068318170
Device Catalogue Number831-817
Device Lot Number0000061422
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/07/2019
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/12/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/05/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age78 YR
-
-