• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OBERDORF SYNTHES PRODUKTIONS GMBH UNK - RESORBABLE IMPLANTS; SURGICAL MESH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OBERDORF SYNTHES PRODUKTIONS GMBH UNK - RESORBABLE IMPLANTS; SURGICAL MESH Back to Search Results
Device Problem No Apparent Adverse Event (3189)
Patient Problems Visual Impairment (2138); No Code Available (3191)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is for an unknown absorbable mesh (rapidsorb)/unknown lot.Part and lot numbers are unknown; udi number is unknown.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.(b)(4).Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
This report is being filed after the review of the following journal article: kim, h.S., kim, s.E., evans, g., and park, s.H.(2012), the usability of the upper eyelid crease approach for correction of medial orbital wall blowout fracture, plastic and reconstructive surgery, vol 130(4), pages 898-905 (usa).The aim of this study was to overcome the problems of other surgical approaches, they proposed an eyelid crease approach through the medial one-third of the lid crease and a 2- to 3-mm superomedial extension incision as a consistent way of reconstruction moderate or severe blowout fractures of the medial orbital wall and investigating the usefulness of this approach.From april of 2009 to march of 2011, a total of 22 patients (17 males and 5 females) with a mean age of 33.9 years (range 9-56 years) underwent reconstruction using a titanium mesh and a porous polyethylene sheet from our competitor's and an unknown synthes absorbable mesh (rapidsorb).Follow-up was 8 to 28 months with an average of 18.3 months.The following complications were reported as follows: 2 patients had revisions in the initial cases where the posterior part of the implant protruded into the orbital cavity and the superior edge was located lateral to the superior oblique muscle.2 patients complained of diplopia on lateral gaze for 6 months, which improved with time.2 patients who had medial and inferior orbital wall fracture developed mild enophthalmos (<1 mm).2 patients developed mild hypertrophic scar at the junction of upper lid crease and superomedial extension incision, but improved in 6 months with conservative management.Patient 2 had a revision surgery.This is for an unknown synthes absorbable mesh (rapidsorb).This is report 1 of 2 for (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNK - RESORBABLE IMPLANTS
Type of Device
SURGICAL MESH
Manufacturer (Section D)
OBERDORF SYNTHES PRODUKTIONS GMBH
eimattstrasse 3
oberdorf 4436
SZ  4436
Manufacturer Contact
kara ditty-bovard
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6103142063
MDR Report Key8784821
MDR Text Key150836186
Report Number8030965-2019-66198
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EZX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeKS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/14/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/12/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/14/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-