The customer reports observing an increase in atellica im 1600 total hcg (thcg) results within the values of 2-6 (from 4% to 27%), and a decrease in results with values of <2 (from 56% to 35%) in comparison to the advia centaur results.The customer states that they do tracing in patients with testicular cancer and choriocarcinoma.Neither the advia centaur or atellica im total hcg assays are validated for use as a tumor marker.These assays are intended to be used as an aid in the assessment of pregnancy status.The atellica im thcg assay uses the same reagent formulation as the advia centaur.The comparison between the atellica im and advia centaur was determined during validation.The instrument is performing within specifications.No further evaluation of the device is required.The ifu states in the interpretation of results section: "results of this assay should always be interpreted in conjunction with the patient's medical history, clinical presentation, and other findings." the ifu states in the limitations section: "all in vitro assays can generate erroneous results, both clinically false positive results (test results suggesting a condition that is absent) and clinically false negative results (test results failing to identify a condition that is present).This kit is not intended for any use other than assessment of pregnancy status.".
|