• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM JET7 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM JET7 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 5MAXJET7KIT
Device Problems Failure to Advance (2524); Material Integrity Problem (2978); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 06/30/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has been returned and the investigation results are pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the internal carotid artery (ica) using a penumbra system jet 7 reperfusion catheter (jet7).During the procedure, while attempting to advance the jet7 through a neuron max 6f 088 long sheath (neuron max), the physician experienced resistance and the jet7 became stuck and would not advance any further.Therefore, the jet7 was removed and found to be damaged.The procedure was completed using a new penumbra system ace 68 reperfusion catheter (ace68) and the same neuron max.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Results: the jet7 was fractured approximately 39.0, 73.0 and 73.5 cm from the hub.The device was kinked approximately 72.0 and 79.5 cm from the hub.The device was ovalized from approximately 81.0 ¿ 94.0 cm from the hub.The coil winds within the distal fractured segment of the jet7 was pulled out of the catheter lumen.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned jet7 confirmed a fracture and revealed the proximal fractured segment was within an rhv.If the rhv is overtightened onto the jet7, resistance may be experienced during retraction of the jet7 from the rhv.If the jet7 is forcefully retracted against resistance, damage such as a fracture may occur.Further evaluation revealed additional fractures, kinks and an ovalization.These damages were likely incidental to the reported complaint.The neuron max identified in the complaint was not returned for evaluation; therefore, the root cause of the resistance experienced during the procedure could not be determined.Penumbra catheters are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The product lot number was not provided, therefore, the manufacturing records could not be reviewed.H3 other text : placeholder.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Please note that the following section was incorrectly reported on the follow-up #01 mfr report and is being corrected on this follow-up #02 mfr report: 3005168196-2019-01510 1.Section h.Box6.Method code 2 h3 other text : placeholder.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SYSTEM JET7 REPERFUSION CATHETER
Type of Device
NRY
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
MDR Report Key8857725
MDR Text Key153294286
Report Number3005168196-2019-01510
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NRY
UDI-Device Identifier00814548019925
UDI-Public00814548019925
Combination Product (y/n)Y
PMA/PMN Number
K173761
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,07/05/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/02/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number5MAXJET7KIT
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/23/2019
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Date Manufacturer Received01/14/2005
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age60 YR
-
-