• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: VASCULAR SOLUTIONS, LLC LANGSTON V2; DUEL LUMEN

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

VASCULAR SOLUTIONS, LLC LANGSTON V2; DUEL LUMEN Back to Search Results
Model Number 5540
Device Problem Material Fragmentation (1261)
Patient Problem Vessel Or Plaque, Device Embedded In (1204)
Event Date 07/08/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Five units of the same model of langston were returned for evaluation per site request.Four of the units were unused/unopen and one was the damaged device used in the case.A manufacturing record review was completed and zero related nonconformances were found, therefore supporting the device met material, assembly and performance specifications prior to shipment.The unused units were inspected and no defects or nonconformances were present.The unit returned from the case was evaluated.The inner catheter lumen was separated about 3" from the distal tip.There was a kink on the inner lumen shaft just proximal of the separation point.Whitening of the pebax at the separation point confirms stretching of the material prior to separation.There was a kink on the inner lumen shaft just proximal of the separation point.Whitening of the pebax at the separation point confirms stretching of the material prior to separation.It is likely that the catheter lumen was weakened due to the kink and when the doctor tried to push the wire through the weakened section of the langston it tore the pebax material leading to the separation.
 
Event Description
Dr.Performed langston introduction as usual through the right radial access point.Anatomy was tortuous in this patient, but not out of the ordinary for this approach.Jwire and tig were used to cross the valve.The tig came out, leaving just the wire.The langston was introduced over the wire.The wire was removed.Transducer measurements were taken.The wire was reintroduced into langston for removal.The wire stopped/would not advance all the way into the langston.On the image is was observed the langston had bent/kinked at one of the curved areas - the distal subclavian artery.The wire could not be advanced past the bent portion, even with some manipulation techniques.Eventually when the wire was attempted to be pushed through it caused separation of the tip of the langston at the bend point.In order to retrieve the detached langston tip (about 3.5" in length) a new access point was created in the groin with an 8f sheath.A snare was used through this access site to successfully retrieve the detached tip.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LANGSTON V2
Type of Device
DUEL LUMEN
Manufacturer (Section D)
VASCULAR SOLUTIONS, LLC
6464 sycamore court north
minneapolis MN 55369
Manufacturer (Section G)
VASCULAR SOLUTIONS, INC
6464 sycamore court north
minneapolis MN 55369
Manufacturer Contact
mary haufek
6464 sycamore court north
minneapolis, MN 55369
7636564230
MDR Report Key8868669
MDR Text Key153811984
Report Number2134812-2019-00055
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DQO
UDI-Device Identifier10841156100513
UDI-Public(01)10841156100513
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K051395
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/09/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/07/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/05/2021
Device Model Number5540
Device Catalogue Number5540
Device Lot Number646247
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/29/2019
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/09/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/18/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age78 YR
Patient Weight98
-
-