This report is for an unknown veptr construct/unknown lot.Part and lot numbers are unknown; udi number is unknown.Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.(b)(4).Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.(b)(4).
|
This report is being filed after the review of the following journal article: vidal, i., gomez, n., and batlle, a.(2011), scoliosis in imperfect osteogenesis: is veptr a treatment option?, european spine journal, vol.20, page 2095 (spain).The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy od scoliosis treatment with a vertically expandable prosthetic titanium rib (veptr) in patients with io.A total of 3 patients (2 female and 1 male) aged 9, 6 and 4 years old were included in this study.All three patients were surgically treated by placement of a veptr thoracic distraction device (rib-to-rib and hybrid in two cases and rib-to-pelvis in one).The mean follow-up time was 18 months to 6 years.The following complications were reported as follows: complications included pull-out due rib fracture in two patients, both occurring after the first lengthening and requiring a re-operation with new fixation.This is report 1 of 2 for (b)(4).This report is for a vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (veptr) (synthes).
|