• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CALDERA MEDICAL INC. TRANSVAGINAL 3.0 MM INTRODUCER; TRANSVAGINAL INTRODUCER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CALDERA MEDICAL INC. TRANSVAGINAL 3.0 MM INTRODUCER; TRANSVAGINAL INTRODUCER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number CAL-TV30
Device Problem Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
Patient Problem Bowel Perforation (2668)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Several attempts have been made to obtain additional details of the reported event and no further information has been received as of the date of this report.Awaiting instrument return for investigation.A new set of instruments were sent as replacements to the facility.Lot history records for instrument on file at the customer indicates no non-conformances or deviations that may have caused or contributed to this incident based upon the reported event.The risk of bladder/organ perforation is a known potential adverse event and is listed in the adverse reactions section of the desara tv product ifu # 10-139-06.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2019, dr.(b)(6) reports in an email: "i was handed a trocar that had less of a curve and i punctured the bladder." surgeon and sales rep were contacted for further information.On 08/13/2019, sales rep provides additional information: "i met with her and she said the wrong trocar was brought into the or.I am going tomorrow to meet with her or nurse to look over all trocars they have and figure out which one was brought in.She said she believed the instrument handle ended in a "30".Surgeon kept trying to find the case, patient and all that info and couldn't find it and said she'd have to look into it further for me.She said she remembered the trocar instrument ending in 30 not 32 though.She unfortunately didn't have much prepared for me or much information.She said it was early this year and she had finally just got around to contacting us about it.All she could tell me: she was doing transvaginal and the trocars looked almost identical, but she noticed the handle seemed different.She thought maybe they gave her the suprapubic instrument vs transvaginal.".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Two cal-tv30 instruments have been received at coroporate (lot # 46594) for investigation.Per engineering analysis both instruments of cal-tv30 passed tip inspectiont test and are considered to be within specification according to drawing 02-231 for tip dimensioning.Concluding this engineering analysis, the returned instruments demonstrate mechanical deformity due to apparent modification when measured to the device drawing and specifications.It appears that the instruments were equally modified, which affected the functionality of the instruments.Modification of instruments is contraindicated in the warnings section of the indications for use (ifu), #10-193.The disposition of these instruments is quarantined and not available for future use.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRANSVAGINAL 3.0 MM INTRODUCER
Type of Device
TRANSVAGINAL INTRODUCER
Manufacturer (Section D)
CALDERA MEDICAL INC.
5171 clareton drive
agoura hill CA 91301
MDR Report Key8902334
MDR Text Key154759328
Report Number3003990090-2019-01485
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PWJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/29/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/16/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator No Information
Device Catalogue NumberCAL-TV30
Device Lot Number46594
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/21/2019
Date Manufacturer Received07/18/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
-
-