Analysis: the device in question was received and reviewed to determine the cause of the complaint.The package when opened only contained a 9mm x 59mm eptfe covered stent.The stent delivery system was not returned.Based on this information the returned device is the 3rd device described in the complaint details as the 9mm x 59mm stent had apparently been deployed on the bench outside the patient.The eptfe covering was torn in the middle of the stent.The reason for the tear in the covering is due to the stent being deployed in the air and not in body temperature fluid.It was reported that the stent was deployed outside the patient was to utilize the balloon.The details indicated that the balloon ruptured when deploying the stent however the stent delivery system was not returned with the stent therefore we are not able to confirm that the balloon had ruptured.Being that two other icast covered stents were previously deployed it is not clear why a 3rd device was utilized only for the balloon as mentioned two other balloons would have been available.A full review of the catheter lot history records was performed.Below is an overview of the quality and performance criteria that every lot of icast covered stent systems is tested to.This inspection requires that the catheter lot must pass the following: ability of the stent and delivery system to be passed through the labeled introducer sheath (6fr).Ability to deploy the stent at nominal pressure (8atm).Ability to withdraw the deflated balloon catheter back through the labeled introducer sheath ability of the delivery system to withstand 5 inflate/deflate cycles at the rated burst pressure (12atm) without leaks or failures.Balloon burst testing.The balloon must burst over the rated burst pressure specified on the label (12atm).This lot of catheters passed all quality and performance criteria without any non-conformances related to the complaint.Conclusion: based on the details of the complaint and the fact that the stent was not deployed within the patient but on the bench, atrium medical corporation cannot conclude that the device in question was faulty.
|