SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD BHR ACETABULAR CUP 58MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 74122158 |
Device Problems
Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
Patient Problems
Muscle Weakness (1967); Pain (1994); Toxicity (2333); Injury (2348); Reaction (2414); Test Result (2695)
|
Event Date 12/10/2018 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a revision surgery was performed due to pain, metallosis with metal debris, abductor muscle damage, elevated chromium and cobalt levels, systemic effects, and adverse local tissue reaction.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
It was reported that left hip revision surgery was performed.During the revision, the bhr cup, hemi head and sleeve were removed.The stem remained implanted.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment, and additional information have been requested for this complaint but have not become available.A review of the complaint history for the bhr cup, hemi head, modular sleeve and stem was performed using batch numbers in search of similar recurring reports for the products during their lifetimes.No other similar complaints were identified for the stem.Similar complaints have been identified for the bhr cup.This will continue to be monitored.Similar complaints have been identified for the hemi head and modular sleeve.However, as the devices are no longer sold, no action is to be taken.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.Review of manufacturing records did not reveal any waivers, concessions, manufacturing or material abnormalities that could have contributed to this issue.Review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.No additional risks were identified as result of the reported event and no further actions are required at this time.The available medical documents were reviewed.The reported adverse local tissues reaction and elevated cocr levels may be consistent with an adverse reaction to metal debris, but this cannot be confirmed based on the information provided.Without supporting lab/pathology results, pre and post-radiographic images, and/or the analysis of the explanted components, the root cause of the reported clinical symptoms cannot be concluded and it cannot be concluded that the reported clinical reactions were associated with a mal-performance of the implant.The patient impact beyond the revision and associated post-op pain cannot be determined.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the details supplied in this complaint, and our investigation remains inconclusive.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.No preventative or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
It was reported that left hip revision surgery was performed.During the revision, the bhr cup, hemi head and sleeve were removed.The stem remained implanted.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment, and additional information have been requested for this complaint but have not become available.A review of the complaint history for the bhr cup, hemi head, sleeve and stem was performed using batch numbers in search of similar recurring reports for the products during their lifetimes.No other similar complaints were identified for the stem.Similar complaints have been identified for the bhr cup.This will continue to be monitored.Similar complaints have been identified for the hemi head and sleeve.However, as the devices are no longer sold, no action is to be taken.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.Review of manufacturing records did not reveal any waivers, concessions, manufacturing or material abnormalities that could have contributed to this issue.Review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.No additional risks were identified as result of the reported event and no further actions are required at this time.The available medical documents were reviewed.The reported adverse local tissue reaction and elevated cobalt and chromium levels may be consistent with an adverse reaction to metal debris, but this cannot be confirmed based on the information provided.Without supporting pre and postradiographic images, and/or the analysis of the explanted components, the root cause of the reported dislocation and clinical symptoms cannot be concluded and it cannot be concluded that the reported clinical reactions were associated with a mal-performance of the implant.The patient impact beyond the revision and associated post-op pain cannot be determined.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the details supplied in this complaint, and our investigation remains inconclusive.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.No preventative or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|