• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION HANCOCK II AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION HANCOCK II AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number T505
Device Problems Material Perforation (2205); Material Deformation (2976); Unintended Movement (3026); Separation Problem (4043)
Patient Problems Host-Tissue Reaction (1297); Aortic Regurgitation (1716); Aortic Valve Stenosis (1717); Calcium Deposits/Calcification (1758); Endocarditis (1834); Thrombus (2101); Blood Loss (2597)
Event Date 01/01/2007
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Citation: butany et al.A 10-year comparison of explanted hancock-ii and carpentier-edwards supraannular bioprostheses.Cardiovascular pathology, 2007 jan-feb; 16(1): 4-13.Earliest date of publish used for event date.No unique device identifier (serial/lot) numbers were provided; without this information it could not be determined whether these observations have been previously reported.Without return of the product no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observations.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.[(b)(4)].
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information via literature regarding a 10-year comparison of explanted hancock-ii and carpentier-edwards supra-annular bioprostheses.All data were collected from bioprostheses explanted from a single center between january 1994 and june 2004.The overall implant population included 2839 patients, 2297 patients (predominantly male, mean age 62.8 years) of which were implanted with medtronic hancock ii bioprosthetic valves (no serial numbers provided) designed for atrial or mitral valve positions.From january 1994 and june 2004, a total of 163 valves (98 hancock ii and 65 carpentier-edwards) were explanted and analyzed in this study.Observations of explanted hancock ii valves included evidence of: outward splaying of the stent posts, material dehiscence/detachment, calcification, tear/perforation, cusp prolapse, pannus, thrombus, endocarditis, hemorrhage, lipid/serum insudation, stenosis, and incompetence.Based on the available information medtronic product was directly associated with the observations.No additional adverse patient effects or product performance issues were reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HANCOCK II AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key9124751
MDR Text Key160235844
Report Number2025587-2019-02929
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
PMA/PMN Number
P980043
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,l
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/26/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/26/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberT505
Device Catalogue NumberT505
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/11/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age63 YR
-
-