• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE Back to Search Results
Model Number 3058
Device Problems Break (1069); Human-Device Interface Problem (2949); Material Twisted/Bent (2981)
Patient Problem Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Date 09/06/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant medical products: product id: 3889-28, lot#: va1lbg2, implanted: (b)(6) 2018, explanted: (b)(6) 2019, product type: lead.Other relevant device(s) are: product id: 3889-28, serial/lot #: (b)(4), ubd: 27-oct-2021, udi#: (b)(4).If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
The healthcare professional (hcp) reported the lead fractured near the tine part during removal/explant of the implantable neurostimulator (ins) system.It was further reported that while the ins was extracted, the tip of the lead remained in the patient¿s body; the outer skin and electrode part remained in the patient¿s body.There was ¿no choice but to close the wound with the tip of the lead remaining in the body.¿ though it was noted the lead¿s core wire could be extracted, it was ¿presumed that a part remained in the patient¿s body.¿ after the procedure, no health injury to the patient was observed.As it was presumed the patient would undergo an mri at another facility in the future, the physician was asked to instruct the patient to bring their sacral neuromodulation (snm) identifying notebook.Further information received reported the patient¿s initial lead implant was ¿difficult and it was anxious.¿ when inserting the lead, ¿the tip was bent by the method of [the physician].¿ it was reportedly ¿unknown whether the shape of the sacral hold and the anatomical factors ahead of the sacral hole had an impact¿ on the implant.Ultimately, ¿it was considered that removal would be difficult when insertion was difficult.¿ it was noted the ¿patient¿s physique was large and the patient¿s fat was thick.At the time of removal, while confirming with the c-arm, tissue detachment was advanced by using a thin mosquito and it was picked with the same mosquito near the tine.When an attempt was made to remove it by pulling almost vertically, the event this time occurred.The shape when picking might have been pinpointed and applied load in the condition of lead and mosquito crossing.The shape of the equipment used must be considered as well.¿ the patient was scheduled to have the part removed on (b)(6) 2019.There were no further complications reported or anticipated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant medical products: product id: 3889-28, lot#: va1lbg2, implanted: (b)(6) 2018, explanted: (b)(6) 2019, product type: lead.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information received reported the tined lead was broken during removal and that this resulted in unretrieved device fragments.It was noted the patient needed to undergo an mri, but because there was a ¿certain length of tined lead still left in the body,¿ it seemed that the patient would not be able to undergo an mri for this reason.There were no further complications reported or anticipated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information received reported that an explant surgery occurred on (b)(6) 2019 in order to address the lead piece that remained in the patient.The cause of the lead fracture was undetermined.There were no further issues reported as of (b)(6) 2019.There were no further complications reported or anticipated.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTERSTIM II
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key9146592
MDR Text Key165030395
Report Number3004209178-2019-18847
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EZW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
P970004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/08/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/02/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/14/2019
Device Model Number3058
Device Catalogue Number3058
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/30/2019
Date Device Manufactured01/17/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age84 YR
-
-