The device has not been returned to date; however, images provided show that the device was removed in three pieces.If the device is returned to integra, the complaint will be updated accordingly.Review of the dhr for lot 152948t shows that no nonconformances were generated and all units in the lot met specifications at the time of final release.Based on the visual review of the explanted components (images), it is unclear how/when the fracture occurred; however, the fracture appearance is consistent with a rapid brittle, bending fracture.It is unclear if the breakage occurred during implant (during impaction) and went unnoticed or occurred post-implant due to patient action.
|
A distributor reported that on (b)(6) 2019, a patient underwent revision of a proximal pyrocarbon mcp implant (id mcp-100-50p-ww - mcp sz.50 proximal ww) that was used as a hemi replacement in the right index finger.Revision surgery was indicated 6-8 months post initial surgery due to a fractured stem.The patient presented due to complaining of pain.No known incident was reported that to have caused the fracture, and the patient was reported to have followed the postoperative instructions.
|