• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LIVANOVA USA, INC. LEAD MODEL 302

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LIVANOVA USA, INC. LEAD MODEL 302 Back to Search Results
Model Number 302-20
Device Problems Corroded (1131); Fracture (1260); Device Contamination with Body Fluid (2317)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 09/13/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that during the generator replacement for the patient, high impedance was seen when the leads were attached to the new generator.The previous generator could not be interrogated due to battery depletion prior to surgery and therefore high impedance was not seen on the patient's previously implanted generator.The surgeon elected to explant and replace the lead noting a fracture was visible in the lead.The patient's leads have been received into product analysis however analysis as not been completed to date.No additional relevant information has been received to date.
 
Event Description
Lead analysis completed.The lead was explanted and returned due to fracture of leads and high impedance and these allegations were confirmed in product analysis (pa) lab.Note that a portion of the lead assembly (body) including the electrodes was not returned for analysis; therefore a complete evaluation could not be performed on the entire lead.During the visual analysis the connector ring quadfilar coil appeared to be broken approximately 175mm from the end of the connector boot.The coils strands were mechanically damaged with pitting.The remaining broken coil strands were identified as having stress induced fractures and mechanical damage, no putting.It is believed that stimulation was present for a certain period of time as evidenced by the presence of metal pitting.The coil shows characteristics typical of lead discontinuity (material fracture, rough or pitted surface, thinned material thickness, electro-etching or material dissolution).The abraded openings found in the outer and connector ring inner silicone tubing and the cut ends that were made during the explant process most likely provided the leakage path for the dried remnants of what appeared to be body fluids.For the observed connector pin inner tubing fluid remnants, there was no obvious path for fluid ingress other than the cut ends.With the exception of the observed discontinuity the condition of the returned lead portion is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure.No other obvious anomalies were noted.The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present.Continuity checks of the returned lead portion were performed during the visual analysis and no other discontinuities were identified.Based on the findings in the pa lab, there is evidence to suggest a discontinuity in the returned portion of the lead may have contributed to the fracture of leads and high impedance.Note that since a portion of the lead assembly (body) including the electrodes was not returned for analysis, an evaluation and resulting commentary cannot be made on that portion of the lead.Generator analysis was also completed on the generator that was opened but not used in the patient.The allegation of high impedance was not duplicated in the pa lab.Various electrical loads were attached to the generator and results of the diagnostic tests demonstrate accurate resistance measurements.The pulse generator diagnostics were as expected for the programmed parameters.A comprehensive automated electrical evaluation showed that the device performed according to functional specifications.
 
Event Description
Implant form was received from day of surgery reporting that high impedance was seen.No additional relevant information has been received to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Section b6.Relevant tests/laboratory data, including dates; corrected data: impedance value known and inadvertently not reported in initial mdr.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEAD MODEL 302
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
LIVANOVA USA, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
MDR Report Key9167693
MDR Text Key161713803
Report Number1644487-2019-01958
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MUZ
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/16/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/08/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date11/30/2008
Device Model Number302-20
Device Lot Number1547
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/27/2019
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received11/16/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age41 YR
-
-