• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EXACTECH, INC. EQUINOXE; HUMERAL LONG STEM 8MM 175MM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EXACTECH, INC. EQUINOXE; HUMERAL LONG STEM 8MM 175MM Back to Search Results
Model Number 306-01-08
Device Problems Loose or Intermittent Connection (1371); Component Missing (2306); Positioning Problem (3009); Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth (4002)
Patient Problems Failure of Implant (1924); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 08/16/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Pending evaluation.Concomitant device(s): reverse adapter plate +0 (cat# 320-10-00 / sn# (b)(4)), torque defining screw kit (cat# 320-20-00 / sn# (b)(4)), 42mm reverse constrained humeral liner +0 (cat# 320-42-10 / sn# (b)(4)).
 
Event Description
This female patient had a total shoulder arthroplasty on her right shoulder.She had a subsequent revision surgery which took place on (b)(6) 2014 and was performed at (b)(6) hospital.It seems that the surgeon revised the humeral components in place and used a humeral long stem (8x175) for this patient.The cemented long revision stem, had become extremely loose and spun 180 degrees within the humeral canal, resulting in the need for a second revision surgery.When the surgeon dissected down to the implants and removed the stem it had no cement on it.A revision was done to place a fluted cemented fracture stem in its place.Operation was a success, patient left the or in stable condition and surgeon expects patient to do well.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Section h10: (d6) if implanted, give date: (b)(6) 2014 (h3) the revision reported was likely the result of an insufficient bond between the implant, host bone, and allograft, which could have limited the amount of cement between the humeral stem and humeral canal and led to aseptic (non-infected) humeral loosening.However, this cannot be confirmed as the devices were not returned for evaluation and x-rays were not provided.(h6) evaluation codes: 1924, 4002.Section h11: the following sections have corrected information: (b5) describe event or problem: as reported, this female patient had a total shoulder arthroplasty on her right shoulder.We are unsure of when this was performed and by whom.She had a subsequent revision surgery which took place on (b)(6) 2014 and was performed.It seems that that the humeral components were revised in place and used a humeral long stem (8x175) for this patient.The cemented long revision stem, had become extremely loose and spun 180o within the humeral canal, resulting in the need for a second revision surgery.When the surgeon dissected down to the implants and removed the stem it had no cement on it, and surgeon complained the round smooth cemented design was the issue.A revision was done to place a fluted cemented fracture stem in its place.Operation was a success, patient left the or in stable condition and surgeon expects patient to do well.Explants were kept by hospital as they do not allow us to take them.*no information provided in the following section(s): a4, a5, b6, b7, g8, h7, h9.
 
Event Description
As reported, this female patient had a total shoulder arthroplasty on her right shoulder.We are unsure of when this was performed and by whom.She had a subsequent revision surgery which took place on (b)(6) 2014 and was performed.It seems that that the humeral components were revised in place and used a humeral long stem (8x175) for this patient.The cemented long revision stem, had become extremely loose and spun 180o within the humeral canal, resulting in the need for a second revision surgery.When the surgeon dissected down to the implants and removed the stem it had no cement on it, and surgeon complained the round smooth cemented design was the issue.A revision was done to place a fluted cemented fracture stem in its place.Operation was a success, patient left the or in stable condition and surgeon expects patient to do well.Explants were kept by hospital as they do not allow us to take them.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EQUINOXE
Type of Device
HUMERAL LONG STEM 8MM 175MM
Manufacturer (Section D)
EXACTECH, INC.
2320 nw 66 court
gainesville FL 32653
MDR Report Key9179100
MDR Text Key169825090
Report Number1038671-2019-00505
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KWT
UDI-Device Identifier10885862083784
UDI-Public10885862083784
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K042021
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/14/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/11/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/17/2013
Device Model Number306-01-08
Device Catalogue Number306-01-08
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received04/13/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
SEE H10
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age69 YR
-
-