• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC US UNKNOWN SHOULDER HUMERAL CUP

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC US UNKNOWN SHOULDER HUMERAL CUP Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK SHOULDER HUMERAL CUP
Device Problems Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Naturally Worn (2988)
Patient Problems Bone Fracture(s) (1870); Hematoma (1884); Pain (1994); Loss of Range of Motion (2032); Joint Dislocation (2374); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 08/27/2012
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).No device was received.Root cause undetermined.Depuy synthes considers the investigation closed at this time.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed and the investigation may be re-opened as necessary.(b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
In the article entitled ¿revision of reversed total shoulder arthroplasty.Indications and outcome.¿ written by mazda farshad; marion grogli; sabrina catanzaro; and christian gerber; was reviewed.The articles purpose was a retrospective study to identify the reasons for revision of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rtsa) and to report outcomes.The article was based on rtsa¿s performed with implants of the: delta iii (depuy) 232 implanted, and a competitor, 248 implanted between 1999-2008.67 cases needed at least one additional intervention to treat a complication, 30 of them needed a second, eleven of them a third and four a fourth additional intervention.The most common complication requiring a first intervention was instability, followed by a hematoma or superficial wound complications and complications of the glenoid component.Patients benefited from the rtsa despite the need of additional interventions as indicated by a mean increase in total constant-murley score from 23 points before rtsa to 46 points at final follow-up.Complications were as follows--all of which required revisions: instability resulting in subluxations or dislocation.Five were closed reductions, seven required a change of components to a selection of a higher humeral polyethylene inlay was used in three, revision of glenoid component in two, and revision of a humeral component in two cases.Eight resulted in hematomas with simple evacuation.Three complications of glenoid component-one changed glenoid conversion and two component wear.One for pain.Two deficient in external rotation.Three for infection.Three for humeral component loosening.Two disturbing orif material.Two periprosthetic fractures.One dislocation of greater tuberosity.One heterotopic ossification.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN SHOULDER HUMERAL CUP
Type of Device
SHOULDER HUMERAL CUP
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC US
700 orthopaedic drive
warsaw IN 46581 0988
Manufacturer (Section G)
JTE WARSAW MFG SITE
700 orthopaedic drive
warsaw IN 46582
Manufacturer Contact
kara ditty-bovard
700 orthopaedic drive
warsaw, IN 46581-0988
6107428552
MDR Report Key9281429
MDR Text Key179520086
Report Number1818910-2019-114201
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HSD
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,literature
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/14/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/05/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK SHOULDER HUMERAL CUP
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/14/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-