"literature article entitled, ¿adverse local tissue reactions in metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty due to trunnion corrosion: the risk of misdiagnosis¿ by m.R.Whitehouse, et al, published by the bone and joint journal (2015), vol, 97-b, pp.1024-1030, doi:10.1302/0301-620x.97b8, was reviewed.The authors performed a detailed review of 17 consecutive metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene (mop) thas with a histopathologically confirmed pseudotumor associated with corrosion of the trunnion at the head¿neck junction.The purpose of the review was to highlight the risk of misdiagnosis in this cohort and support efforts to refine the accurate diagnosis of pji.This article contains 17 individual case studies.Of these 17 cases, only patient 4 and patient 14 had depuy products including a prodigy stem and a depuy femoral head.The remaining case studies were implanted with competitor products and are not included in this study.The indications for revision and intraoperative findings are detailed in the individual case event descriptions.In this complaint, case 1 patient #4 is included on the parent (b)(4).Case 2 patient # 14 is included on the attached guidance document and linked to this parent pc.Implants captured in this complaint: prodigy femoral stem and unknown femoral head." (b)(6) male implanted with a depuy prodigy stem, unk 36-mm depuy femoral head, and competitor acetabular components.Revised 64 months after index tha for histopathologically confirmed pseudotumor, pain, periarticular fluid with inflammatory markers, and unspecified instability.Corrosion of the trunnion on the taper junction of both the head and stem.There is insufficient evidence within the article to determine which products were revised.All histopathologic identifications were confirmed intraoperatively.There was gross evidence of bearing wear on the femoral head.There was evidence of soft tissue damage identified intraoperatively.
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary = > no device associated with this report was received for examination.A worldwide lot specific complaint database search, or device history record (dhr) review, was not possible because the required lot number was not provided.The information received will be retained for potential series investigations if triggered by trend analysis, post market surveillance, or other events within the quality system.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|