• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION MOSAIC AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, REPLACEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION MOSAIC AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, REPLACEMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number 30519
Device Problems Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583); Obstruction of Flow (2423)
Patient Problems Aortic Regurgitation (1716); Aortic Valve Stenosis (1717)
Event Date 04/18/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Citation: akodad m et al.Hemodynamic performances and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing valve-in-valve versus native transcatheter aortic valve implantation.Am j cardiol.2019 jul 1;124(1):90-97.Doi: 10.1016/j.Amjcard.2019.04.009 (including supplementary material).Epub 2019 apr 18.Earliest date of publish used for event date.No unique device identifier (serial/lot) numbers were provided; without this information it could not be determined whether these observations have been previously reported.Without the return of the product, no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observations.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information via literature regarding a comparison of the hemodynamic performances and clinical outcomes in patients who underwent aortic valve-in-valve procedure versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with native aortic stenosis.All data were retrospectively collected from two centers between 2013 and 2017.The study population included 132 patients (predominantly female; mean age 83 years), 2 patients were previously implanted with medtronic mosaic surgical aortic valves and one was previously implanted with a medtronic 3f enable surgical aortic valve (no serial numbers provided).Among the mosaic and 3f enable patients, adverse events included: transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation due to stenosis, regurgitation, combination of both, or patient-prosthesis mismatch.Onset of structural valve deterioration was noted to have occurred at a mean 9 years after surgical valve implant.Based on the available information, medtronic product may have been associated with the adverse events.No additional adverse patient effects or product performance issues were reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MOSAIC AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, REPLACEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key9349496
MDR Text Key170791290
Report Number2025587-2019-03531
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DYE
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
PMA/PMN Number
P990064
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,l
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/20/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/20/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number30519
Device Catalogue Number30519
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/15/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age83 YR
-
-