• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; TEST, FACTOR II G20210A MUTATIONS, GENOMIC DNA PCR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; TEST, FACTOR II G20210A MUTATIONS, GENOMIC DNA PCR Back to Search Results
Model Number 9000TFX26
Device Problem Degraded (1153)
Patient Problems Stenosis (2263); Valvular Stenosis (2697)
Event Date 11/12/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Valve stenosis is listed in the instruction for use (ifu) as a potential risk associated with the use of the thv.Per the valve academic research consortium (varc), valve stenosis can result from a number of factors, including pannus, calcification, support structure deformation (out-of-round configuration), trauma, endocarditis, prosthetic valve thrombosis, and native leaflet prolapse impeding prosthetic leaflet motion.Stenosis of an implanted valve may be a manifestation of structural valve deterioration (svd).This term refers to changes intrinsic to the valve, and can include failure modes such as wear, calcification, leaflet tear, stent creep, leaflet disruption, or leaflet retraction.There are cases of svd that result in a combination of regurgitation and stenosis.It may be mild and not require any intervention or it may be moderate to severe.In these cases, it causes the heart to work harder to eject blood from the ventricle.Depending on severity it could be an indication for valve replacement or medical intervention.However, it is possible patient factors such as metabolic issues contributed to the valve stenosis.A very common failure mode is tissue calcification.The mechanisms for bioprosthetic heart valve tissue calcification are not fully understood.Many factors can contribute to the onset and propagation of calcification including patient related (e.G.Patient age, disease state, immune status, and other co-morbidities), pharmacological, and intrinsic properties of the valve itself.It is widely understood that patients with chronic renal disease and prior history of calcific stenosis of the native valve may be predisposed to bioprosthetic calcification.In this case, the cause of the stenosis is unknown.In addition, to the mechanisms described above, patient factors, (progression of a pre-existing disease processes) not provided, may have contributed to the event.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.No corrective or preventative actions are required.
 
Event Description
As reported by a field clinical specialist, approximately 5 years post tavr, a 26mm sapien 3 valve was placed in a pre-existing sapien valve with the commander delivery system and esheath due to stenosis of the sapien valve.There were no adverse event or device malfunctions during the valve in valve procedure.The patient is stable.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Corrected data: f10, h6.Reference capa-20-00141.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS SAPIEN TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE
Type of Device
TEST, FACTOR II G20210A MUTATIONS, GENOMIC DNA PCR
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
MDR Report Key9378054
MDR Text Key168280732
Report Number2015691-2019-04413
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPR
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P110021
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/12/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/26/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/23/2016
Device Model Number9000TFX26
Device Catalogue NumberN/A
Device Lot NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received07/23/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age80 YR
-
-