Valve stenosis is listed in the instruction for use (ifu) as a potential risk associated with the use of the thv.Per the valve academic research consortium (varc), valve stenosis can result from a number of factors, including pannus, calcification, support structure deformation (out-of-round configuration), trauma, endocarditis, prosthetic valve thrombosis, and native leaflet prolapse impeding prosthetic leaflet motion.Stenosis of an implanted valve may be a manifestation of structural valve deterioration (svd).This term refers to changes intrinsic to the valve, and can include failure modes such as wear, calcification, leaflet tear, stent creep, leaflet disruption, or leaflet retraction.There are cases of svd that result in a combination of regurgitation and stenosis.It may be mild and not require any intervention or it may be moderate to severe.In these cases, it causes the heart to work harder to eject blood from the ventricle.Depending on severity it could be an indication for valve replacement or medical intervention.However, it is possible patient factors such as metabolic issues contributed to the valve stenosis.A very common failure mode is tissue calcification.The mechanisms for bioprosthetic heart valve tissue calcification are not fully understood.Many factors can contribute to the onset and propagation of calcification including patient related (e.G.Patient age, disease state, immune status, and other co-morbidities), pharmacological, and intrinsic properties of the valve itself.It is widely understood that patients with chronic renal disease and prior history of calcific stenosis of the native valve may be predisposed to bioprosthetic calcification.In this case, the cause of the stenosis is unknown.In addition, to the mechanisms described above, patient factors, (progression of a pre-existing disease processes) not provided, may have contributed to the event.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.No corrective or preventative actions are required.
|
As reported by a field clinical specialist, approximately 5 years post tavr, a 26mm sapien 3 valve was placed in a pre-existing sapien valve with the commander delivery system and esheath due to stenosis of the sapien valve.There were no adverse event or device malfunctions during the valve in valve procedure.The patient is stable.
|