Model Number SBT-546-100 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction (1907)
|
Event Date 11/06/2019 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Patient's exact age is unknown; however it was reported that the patient was over the age of 18.The lot number is not known per the complainant; therefore, the device manufacture and expiration dates cannot be determined.(b)(4).According to the complainant, the suspect device has been disposed and is not available for return.If any further relevant information is received, a supplemental mdr will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a bite blox was used during an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (egd) procedure performed on (b)(6) 2019.According to the complainant, the patient had an allergic reaction to the elastic of the bite blox.Reportedly, the patient appears to have pre-existing allergies to either polyester or poly urethane.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be fine.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Block b5 was updated.Block a2: patient's exact age is unknown; however it was reported that the patient was over the age of 18.Block d4 and h4: the lot number is not known per the complainant; therefore, the device manufacture and expiration dates cannot be determined.Block h6: problem code 1907 captures the reportable event of allergic reaction.Conclusion code 4316 is being used in lieu of an adequate conclusion code for "device not returned." block h10: according to the complainant, the suspect device has been disposed and is not available for return.If any further relevant information is received, a supplemental mdr will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a bite blox was used during an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (egd) procedure performed on (b)(6) 2019.According to the complainant, the patient had an allergic reaction to the elastic of the bite blox.Reportedly, the patient appears to have pre-existing allergies to either polyester or poly urethane.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be fine.***additional information as of 26dec2019*** the allergic reaction was like a rash around the areas where the bite blox came into contact with the skin.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|