The concerned devices are part of two compassionate use requests and therefore a "compassionate use device".The approval no.'s for these cases are # (b)(4) & (b)(4).The approval letters provide the following information concerning the medical history of the patient: "the patient, b.S., is a (b)(6) female with a history of osteosarcoma.She underwent a limb salvage procedure using a proximal tibial implant and allograft construct.Post-operatively she would later develop an infection which was never treated to eradication.She then had instability around the implant and a plate was added.This led to an additional surgery and revision without clearing the infection, resulting in the eventual removal of the screws and plates.She developed wound problems, drainage, and ultimately had to have the entire implant removed due to gross infection.The surgeon believes the requested device provides the patient the best treatment option.The surgeon identified the implantation of a non-silver prosthetic, fusion, or amputation as the alternative treatment options for this patient.Due to the patient's young age, high risk of infection, increased risk of complications associated with the alternatives, and poor functional outcomes, the surgeon believes the requested device would be in the patient's best interest." the investiongation is not completed yet.The device has not been explanted yet.The revision surgery is scheduled for (b)(6) 2020.
|
The patient got a custom made knee implant at the beginning of this year.It became known, that she requires revision surgery now, because of a fracture of the prox.Tibial implant and a loosening of the tibial stem.The surgeon stated that the patient goes dancing, despite he advised her no to.
|