Without a product return, no product evaluation is able to be conducted.Current information is insufficient to permit a valid conclusion about the cause of this event.If additional information is obtained that adds value to the relevant content of this report and/or a conclusion can be drawn, a follow-up report will be sent.Reference report 3012447612-2019-00555.
|
It was reported that during the procedure, while the surgeon was pulling the probes out, the tips of two probes broke off.The tips were not able to be retrieved and were retained by the patient.There were no reported surgical delays or additional patient impacts reported.This is report one of two.
|
Additional information in b4, d4 (udi is unknown), d10, g4, g7, h2, h3, h4 (mfg date unknown), h6: methods, results, and conclusion codes.The returned device was evaluated.Visual inspection revealed the tip of the device has fractured off.The complaint is confirmed.The dhr for this lot was unable to be found.Actions have been taken as part of capa to address this issue for dhrs going forward.The cause for the failure cannot conclusively be determined.However, possible factors may include: an off axis force applied while the probe was inserted within the bone, very hard bone in the sacrum, and material weakening from previous cases which could cause the probe to fracture when used in this case.
|
It was reported that during the procedure, while the surgeon was pulling the probes out, the tips of two probes broke off.The tips were not able to be retrieved and were retained by the patient.There were no reported surgical delays or additional patient impacts reported.This is report one of two.
|