H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, trend analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), and applicable fmea documents.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a leaking midline catheter was unconfirmed because the problem could not be reproduced.The product returned for evaluation was one 4fr s/l powermidline midline catheter.Usage residues were exhibited throughout the sample.An attempt to infuse water through the sample using a 12ml syringe revealed the sample to be patent to infusion and aspiration with no observed leaks.No leaks were observed during sustained (15 seconds) hydraulic pressurization of the device.Microscopic inspection of the sample did not reveal any evidence of leakage.No deficiencies were discovered during evaluation of the returned sample.Consequently this complaint is unconfirmed at this time.A lot history review (lhr) review is not possible, as no manufacturing lot number has been provided by the complainant.
|