On (b)(6) 2019, a carbomedics standard aortic was intended to be implanted in a patient.Upon inspection of the device after the opening of the box, it was identified that the size on the label tag of the device (i.E.23) did not match with the size on the box (i.E.A5-025).Since the serial number of the tag matched the one on the valve box, the surgeon decided to implant the device in the patient assuming that it is a size 25.Despite the labeling discrepancy, no other perceived issues with the device are reported.The procedure was successfully completed using this valve.The patient was not adversely impacted by this event.
|
The manufacturer completed a full analysis of the manufacturing and quality records to further investigate the reported complaint.The results confirmed that the device size is indeed a 25, as correctly reported in the external and internal packaging, except for the id-tag string, that reports 23.This was the only discrepancy detected, and the device otherwise satisfied all material, visual and performance standards required at the time of manufacture and release.As a result of the investigation performed, the root cause has been identified in a human error, during the preparation of id-tag as the data were manually inserted resulting in the wrong size addition.During the following manufacturing step, the error was not intercepted.Based on the investigation performed, the root cause is therefore identified in a manufacturing deficiency.It should be noted that the ifu states that: "verify that all carton and container labels match with respect to valve catalog number, size, and serial number.In the event of any non-matching information, do not use the valve." as reported from the field, the surgeon noted the labeling error but it was decided anyway to implant the device in the patient assuming that the valve was a 25.Therefore, the decision to implant the device in the patient was performed off-label.
|