|
Catalog Number SEPX-8-40-135 |
Device Problem
Material Deformation (2976)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 12/10/2019 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Physician was using protege rx self-expanding stent along with spider fx embolic protection device during procedure to treat the a moderately calcified lesion in the mid common carotid artery with 90% stenosis.The vessel diameter and lesion length were 7mm and 32mm respectively.The device was prepped per ifu with no issues identified.Kink was noted on the catheter.It was reported that the stent was prepared and pushed in accordance with the standard operation procedure.Due to the relatively tortuous vessels, the catheter was bent during advancement and could not continue to advance.Removal encountered dislocation of the stent.After pulling back, it was found that the push rod was bent and could not be used anymore.A new stent of the same model was used to complete the operation.There was no patient injury reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information: removal difficulties encountered due to partial deployment of the stent however no intervention required.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product analysis: the protégé rx was returned with no ancillary devices.The protégé rx was inspected.The tuohy-borst valve was tightened.With direct light applied to the distal end of the catheter shaft, the stent was not loaded the catheter shaft.A kink was observed to the catheter shaft at approximately 11.5cm from the distal rim of the outer.The catheter shaft was curved at approximately 122 cm from the distal tip.The curvature is consistent with the type of damage encounter if attempting to deploy against resistance.The deployment grips were pulled together and exposed the inner assembly and retainer (without stent).Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|