Title: a comparative study of the use of harmonic scalpel versus unipolar cautery in modified radical mastectomy.Author : pallavi mittal , ashwani kumar, sunmeet kaur, paras kumar pandove, rachan lal singla, jagpal singh.Citation: niger j surg.2017;23:1, 20-25.This comparative study aimed to evaluate the advantage of the harmonic scalpel in modified radical mastectomy in comparison with the traditional use of electrocautery (diathermy) for intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.A total of 50 female patients with confirmed diagnosis of breast carcinoma and planned for modified radical mastectomy were enrolled into two groups by random selection (the first group (group a) (n=25 females) who underwent modified radical mastectomy using harmonic scalpel (ethicon) and the second group (group b) (n=25 females, mean age: 50.36 years) underwent modified radical mastectomy using conventional electrocautery (unipolar cautery).In group a, the harmonic scalpel was used to raise skin flaps and carry out dissection of the breast tissue defined by the pectoralis major muscle below the clavicle superiorly, margin of the sternum medially, inframammary fold overlying the rectus abdominis inferiorly, and serratus anterior muscle to the latissimus dorsi muscle laterally.The instrument was also used to perform axillary dissection.Complaints included seroma (n=3), hematoma (n=1), wound infection (n=6), flap necrosis (n=2), and lymphedema (n=1).Patients with seroma formation settled down by multiple aspirations, with pressure bandage or open drainage within 1 month.The patients with flap necrosis and wound infections were treated with antiseptic dressings, systemic and local antibiotics, and debridement.The patients with wound infection were treated with antibiotics according to culture and sensitivity reports and with sterilized daily dressing.In conclusion, ultracision in comparison to electrocautery is somewhat but not fully advantageous and miraculous.No doubt it causes effective hemostasis and lymphostasis, but its use in modified radical mastectomy is still not cost effective and so, not recommended to be used in countries where cost is a major concern.
|