|
Model Number M00542253 |
Device Problem
Failure to Fire (2610)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 12/03/2019 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Although the suspect device has been received, the evaluation has not been completed.Therefore, the cause of the reported malfunction has not been determined.Upon completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental mdr will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a speedband superview super 7 device was used during an esophageal banding procedure performed in the esophagus on (b)(6) 2019.According to the complainant, prior to the procedure, the device was placed into the scope, but would not fire an elastic band.The procedure was completed with another speedband superview super 7 device.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be fine.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Block h6: problem code 2610 for the reportable issue of bands failed to deploy.Block h10: investigation results received one speedband superview super 7 for analysis.However, it was also noted that the device returned without the ligator head.A visual examination of the trip wire found a crimp present on the trip wire and the trip wire was secured in the handle assembly slot when received.It was possible to observe that the suture was cut at the middle section, and the portion returned was attached to the trip wire loop.A functional evaluation was performed by rotating the handle knob 180 degrees, an audible click was heard and indents were felt.No visible issue was noted with the handle assembly.There was evidence that the suture was cut in order to remove the device from the scope.This condition is not considered as an issue of the device.This failure is likely due to factors or conditions related to procedure during the use of the device that could have affected its performance and its intended purpose.Therefore, the most probable root cause is adverse event related to procedure.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed and confirmed that this device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.A labeling review was performed and from the information available, this device was used per the directions for use (dfu)/product label.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a speedband superview super 7 device was used during an esophageal banding procedure performed in the esophagus on (b)(6)2019.According to the complainant, prior to the procedure, the device was placed into the scope, but would not fire an elastic band.The procedure was completed with another speedband superview super 7 device.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be fine.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|