Model Number 0673 |
Device Problems
Pocket Stimulation (1463); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
|
Patient Problems
Muscle Stimulation (1412); No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); No Code Available (3191)
|
Event Date 12/18/2019 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The lead is expected to be returned for analysis.This report will be updated upon completion of investigation.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported during ongoing use, the ventricle lead was dislocated, and causing diaphragmatic stimulation.The lead was explanted and replaced.There was no harm to the patient, and it was also indicated that the patient did not receive any inappropriate therapy.The patient is also not pacemaker dependent.The new lead showed good sensing values, and the old lead will be returned for analysis.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported during ongoing use, the (rv) right ventricle lead was dislocated, and causing diaphragmatic stimulation.Therefore, the lead was explanted and replaced.The new rv lead showed normal sensing values.There was no harm to the patient, and it was also reported that the patient did not receive any inappropriate therapy.Additionally, it was indicated that the patient is not pacemaker dependent.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Upon receipt at our post market quality assurance laboratory, the lead was received with the helix in an extended position.Visual inspection revealed no abnormalities, as the lead tip/helix appeared normal.A thorough evaluation of the lead was performed.Testing was completed to assess lead electrical performance and inner/outer insulation integrity.Measurements throughout these tests were within normal limits.Microscopic inspections of the terminal pin assembly, lead body, and electrode tip found no anomalies.Laboratory analysis did not identify any lead characteristics that would have caused or contributed to the reported clinical observations.Laboratory observations and the field report were insufficient to verify dislodgment.The allegation of muscle stimulation is a known inherent risk of the device, which likely occurred due to the dislodgment.The surgery allegation could not be confirmed, as there was no evidence of device damage, defect, or malfunction found.Patient code (b)(4) captures the reportable event of surgery.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|