(b)(6) clinical study.It was reported that in-stent restenosis occurred.In (b)(6) 2018, clinical status assessment indicated tha the subject's qualifying condition was stable angina and the index procedure was performed on the same day.The target lesion was located on the 1st obtuse marginal with 90% stenosis and was 38 mm long with a reference vessel diameter of 2.7 mm.The target lesion was treated with pre-dilatation and placement of a 2.50 x 48 mm study stent.Following post-dilatation, residual stenosis was 0%.One day post procedure, the subject was discharged with on dual antiplatelet therapy.In (b)(6) 2019, the subject presented to the emergency department with complaints of worsening chest pain on exertion and fatigue for past several months.It was found out that post stent implantation back in (b)(6) 2018, the subject was in good condition for about 3 months; after that, pain became persistent and worsens with walking on treadmill.The subject was not on any nitro usage and denied any shortness of breath, orthopnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea (pnd), palpitations and syncope.At the time of reporting, the subject was on aspirin and clopidogrel.The subject did not reveal any acute changes as compared to electrocardiogram (ekg) in 2018.In (b)(6) 2019, coronary angiography was performed which revealed 80% proximal stenosis and 80% distal stenosis in the 1st marginal, and 80% stenosis in 2nd marginal, supplied by vein graft.On the same day, two discrete lesions in the proximal and distal part of in 1st marginal were treated with 3.0x12mm and 2.5x12mm non-bsc stents with 0% residual stenosis.Post procedure, no further complications were noted.The patient was discharged on dual antiplatelet therapy.
|