It was reported, "in (b)(6) of 2016 a linx device manufactured by torax medical was implanted to treat gerd at (b)(6) and while in (b)(6), after other attempts to treat gerd such as ppi's had failed.While working in (b)(6) in (b)(6) of 2019, i noticed my gerd symptoms had returned.On (b)(6), i received a positive diagnosis through a test at university of (b)(6) at (b)(6) that the linx had failed and info that my device was part of a recall.Torax medical had agreed to pay for a replacement device but not the surgery or other costs associated with the operation.Because of this, i postponed the surgery for several months and attempted to manage my gerd symptoms with modifications to my diet and ppi's.On (b)(6), 2019 i scheduled the surgery to have the linx removed and have a fundoplication at the university of (b)(6) health center in (b)(6).At this time, my insurance company is denying paying for the surgery.Torax medical is also denying paying for the surgery.When the linx device was removed.It was examined by the dr and he commented the device had deteriorated similar to a cheap piece of jewelry and was broken.This indicated inferior quality of material and poor mfg oversight in the construction of the linx, which resulted in premature failure.Even though the device is under recall.Torax medical does not appear to be responsible for anything other than a replacement device.This does not seem morally or ethically right for a company to be allowed to take this approach.Also, i am faced with who will pay for the device removal, and fundoplication surgery, since my insurance company and torax medical are currently in denial to pay.".
|