Title: using a ¿no drain¿ policy in 342 laparoscopic hepatectomies: which factors predict failure? author/s: takeaki ishizawa, noah b.Zuker, claudius conrad, hao-jan lei, oriana ciacio, norihiro kokudo & brice gayet.Citation: hpb 2014, 16, 494¿499; doi:10.1111/hpb.12165.The aim of this retrospective study was to identify factors that predict the failure of a ¿no drain¿ policy in laparoscopic hepatectomy.Between 1995 and 2010, 342 patients (male=204, female=138; mean age=61 years, age range=18-88 years) underwent laparoscopic hepatic resection.During the procedure, the liver parenchyma was then dissected using bipolar forceps and ultrasonic shears, usually a sonosurg or harmonic scalpel (ethicon).Reported complications included symptomatic fluid collection (n=?); bile leak (n=?); bleeding (n=?); liver insufficiency (n=?); sepsis (n=?); and stenosis of the bile duct (n=?).In conclusion, prophylactic drainage during liver resection should be considered not only in the presence of uncontrollable bile leak or concern for postoperative bleeding risk, but also in patients who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy and those in whom intraoperative blood loss is >400 ml.Otherwise, a ¿no drain¿ policy is safe and would enhance the advantages of minimally invasive liver surgery.
|