The manufacturing records for the onxm-27/29 sn: (b)(6) were reviewed, and it was confirmed that all records were controlled, available for review, and met all specifications per the device master record.All lots passed functional testing and met release specifications.A review of the available information was performed.Onxm-27/29 sn: (b)(6) was implanted in the mitral position of a morbidly obese 40-year-old female patient on (b)(6) 2017.This was a redo operation.The first operation was not identified nor described, unless it refers to placement of an automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (aicd).The patient was exhibiting nyha ill symptoms.Transthoracic echo (tte) suggested the possibility of paravalvular leak (pvl).A follow-up transesophageal echo (tee) indicated severe mitral regurgitation through the valve, i.E.Not paravalvular.However, the tee also indicated normal valve leaflet motion and non-obstructed.On reoperation, the surgeon removed pannus (tissue) surrounding the cuff region of the valve, but also noted that it was not impinging upon the leaflets.In brief, a prosthetic valve without any identifiable abnormalities exhibited severe regurgitation.The decision was made to replace this valve on (b)(6) 2019 (2 years and 172 days post-implant).Per the operative report on (b)(6) 2019, car-knot sutures were removed; the valve was explanted and replaced by an onxm-31/33 sn: (b)(6) prosthesis.Furthermore, the report noted that the explanted valve leaflet motion appeared normal.As of on (b)(6) 2020, the patient "looks and feels well." this is a case of prosthetic valve dysfunction, of unconfirmed origin, as it appeared to be functioning normally and the leaflets did not appear to be obstructed.The valve was not returned to the manufacturer for examination so no direct observations could be made.Root cause for this event is prosthetic valve dysfunction of unidentifiable origin.No further action is required.This report is being submitted as required by federal regulations and does not constitute an admission that the device caused or contributed to the reported event.Furthermore, this report reflects the event as alleged by the complainant and does not imply that the information reported to cryolife is accurate or has been confirmed by cryolife.
|