The device history record was reviewed and found that the component involved met specification.The damaged instrument was returned for further analysis and it was confirmed that the threads had cross threaded.Interview with the sales representative found that the surgeon attempted to keep the incision very minimal, which did not grant them easy trajectory for the instrument.The sales representative reported that the instrument had been inserted into the pin on an angle, thus causing the threads to cross and the instrument to become damaged.Additionally, this instrument is reusable, and its life span depends on the method in which it is used, the duration of use, and its handling between uses.Ultimately, based upon the device history record and interview with the sales representative it was concluded that the instrument failure could not be attributed to the manufacturing of the eleos component.
|