It was reported that a left hip revision was performed due to elevated metal ions in blood and urine, audible squeaking and mechanical grinding, pain, pseudotumor, severe lysis, corrosion and metallosis.
|
It was reported that left hip revision surgery was performed.During the revision, the bhr cup, hemi head and sleeve were removed.The stem remained implanted.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment, and additional information have been requested for this complaint but have not become available.Without definitive part/lot numbers a complete complaint history review cannot be performed for the devices involved.A review of the complaint history review was performed using the part number for a 52mm bhr cup in search of complaints involving elevated test results throughout the lifetime of the product.Similar complaints have been identified and this will continue to be monitored.As no device batch numbers were provided for investigation, a manufacturing record review and device labelling / ifu review could not be performed.If more information is received, this investigation will be reopened.A risk management review was performed.No additional risks were identified as result of the reported event and no further actions are required at this time.The available medical documents were reviewed.It cannot be ruled out that the anteverted cup at 30 degrees and 60 degrees abduction led to the accelerated wear and metallosis.The reported pain, elevated metal ions, pseudotumor and intraoperative findings of trunnionosis and alval may be consistent with findings associated with metallosis.However, the root cause of the pain, elevated ions and metallosis cannot be confirmed.It cannot be concluded that the reported clinical reactions were associated with a mal-performance of the implant versus variation of the initial implant orientation as it is unknown.The patient impact beyond the pain, revision, and expected transient post-op convalescence period cannot be determined.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the details supplied in this complaint.Based on the available information, the suggested root cause for this complaint is improper loading due to the malpositioning of the acetabular component.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.No preventative or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.
|