|
Model Number M00542251 |
Device Problem
Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 01/07/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Patient weight - (b)(6) kg.(b)(4).The device has not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental mdr will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a speedband superview super 7 device was used during an esophageal varicose vein ligation procedure performed on (b)(6) 2020.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the device was detached into two pieces.Reportedly, the whole device was removed from the patient, and the procedure was completed with another speedband superview super 7 device.There was no difficulty experienced upon setting up the device.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be stable.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a speedband superview super 7 device was used during an esophageal varicose vein ligation procedure performed on (b)(6) 2020.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the device was detached into two pieces.Reportedly, the whole device was removed from the patient, and the procedure was completed with another speedband superview super 7 device.There was no difficulty experienced upon setting up the device.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be stable.***additional information received on (b)(6) 2020*** it was reported that the ligator head was detached into pieces.Reportedly, the ligator head was removed from the patient without any intervention.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Block a4: patient weight - 74.5 kg block h6: device code 2907 for the reportable issue of ligator housing detached.Block h10: although the suspect device has been received, the evaluation has not been completed.Therefore, the cause of the reported malfunction has not been determined.Upon completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental mdr will be filed.Additional information: b1, b5, d10, h1, h3, h6.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a speedband superview super 7 device was used during an esophageal varicose vein ligation procedure performed on (b)(6), 2020.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the device was detached into two pieces.Reportedly, the whole device was removed from the patient, and the procedure was completed with another speedband superview super 7 device.There was no difficulty experienced upon setting up the device.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be stable.***additional information received on (b)(6), 2020*** it was reported that the ligator head was detached into two pieces.Reportedly, the ligator head was removed from the patient without any intervention.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Block a4: patient weight - 74.5 kg block h6: device code 2907 for the reportable issue of ligator housing detached.Block h10: investigation results the returned speedband superview super 7 device and the ligator head were analyzed.A visual evaluation noted that the crimp was present on the trip wire and the trip wire was secured in the handle assembly slot.The ligator head had three bands present which were moved out of their original positions.It was also noticed that some of the ligator teeth were bent.Additionally, it was observed that the suture was likely cut by a sharp tool and remained attached to the tripwire distal loop.It was noted that there were four knots on the suture.The suture hole showed a stress mark.A functional evaluation was performed by rotating the handle knob 180 degrees, an audible click was heard and indents were felt.No visible issue was noted with the handle assembly.No other issues with the device were noted.The reported event was not confirmed.Based on the evaluation of the returned device, no failures were found that could have reduced the performance of the device during the procedure.The returned device review showed no evidence of either the alleged(s) or any defect which could have contributed to the event.Therefore, the most probable root cause for this complaint is no problem detected.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed and confirmed that this device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.A labeling review was performed and, from the information available, this device was used per the directions for use (dfu)/product label.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|