As reported, a revision of a primary shoulder.The surgeon was concerned because it failed secondary to metallosis from the morse taper.The head was grossly loose as was the adapter with gross metal debris throughout.The surgeon thought it was just the glenoid, but once in there, it was impressively more on the humeral side.The devices will not be returned.
|
Section h10: (h3) the revision reported was likely the result of aseptic (non-infected) loosening, which may have been secondary to metallosis from the taper between the humeral head and replicator plate.However, underlying cause of the metallosis cannot be confirmed as the devices were not available for evaluation and no further details were provided.(h6) evaluation codes: 1924, 4002.
|