Model Number N/A |
Device Problem
Fracture (1260)
|
Patient Problem
No Patient Involvement (2645)
|
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Product has been received by zimmer biomet and the investigation is in process.Once the investigation has been completed, a follow-up mdr will be submitted.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported through the wire form that the tasp fractured.This fracture is not believed to have been identified during surgery.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional information.Visual inspection of the returned tasp to verify item and lot combination and reviewed manufacturing date as returned tasp exhibits signs of repeated use (nicked & gouged).The tasp has fractured and not all the pieces were returned.The dhr was reviewed and no discrepancies relevant to the reported event were found.Evaluation of the returned device identified the fracture was consistent with the tasp fractures analyzed in a zrm.The zrm identified that the common failure modes for the tasp devices include either bending overload or low cycle fatigue culminating in bending overload as evident by the presence of hackle marks, river lines and striations features on the fracture surface.A definitive root cause cannot be determined.If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.
|
|
Event Description
|
No further event information available at the time of this report.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|