• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SILK ROAD MEDICAL, INC. ENROUTE TRANSCAROTID NEUROPROTECTION SYSTEM; TEMPORARY CAROTID CATHETER FOR EMBOLIC CAPTURE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SILK ROAD MEDICAL, INC. ENROUTE TRANSCAROTID NEUROPROTECTION SYSTEM; TEMPORARY CAROTID CATHETER FOR EMBOLIC CAPTURE Back to Search Results
Model Number SR-200-NPS
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Patient Problem/Medical Problem (2688); Vascular Dissection (3160)
Event Date 02/11/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The product in complaint was not returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.A review of the manufacturing records for this device was completed and no issues were identified that could have lead to the adverse event reported.Complaints will continue to be monitored for any trends.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a (b)(6) year old male patient underwent a right transcarotid artery revascularization (tcar) procedure on (b)(6) 2020.When the physician attempted to insert the enroute.035 wire, it was not stabilized upon enroute sheath insertion.The physician pulled back from the external carotid into the proximal common carotid artery (cca) which appeared to cause a dissection in the patient's cca.The physician then attempted to rotate the sheath advance the wire, but this was unsuccessful.A decision was then made to close the arteriotomy with a pre-close stitch and re-access.The physician then placed new pre-close stitch slightly distal to prior access.The enhance.018 access wire would not advance either, therefore the physician decided to close that access as well and convert to cea (carotid endarterectomy).The physician successfully performed the cea on the right internal carotid artery (rica).Using imaging to reassess post flow dynamics the physician noticed the dissection flap in the mid common carotid artery.The physician then gained retrograde access in the rica and proceeded with stenting (enroute stent 8x30) the mid rica in a retrograde fashion.The physician was satisfied with the final imaging and completed the case.The patient was extubated and was able to follow commands, moving all 4 extremities without difficulty.No additional details were provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENROUTE TRANSCAROTID NEUROPROTECTION SYSTEM
Type of Device
TEMPORARY CAROTID CATHETER FOR EMBOLIC CAPTURE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SILK ROAD MEDICAL, INC.
1213 innsbruck dr.
sunnyvale, ca
Manufacturer (Section G)
SILK ROAD MEDICAL, INC.
1213 innsbruck dr
sunnyvale,, ca
Manufacturer Contact
1213 innsbruck dr. sunnyvale,
sunnyvale, ca 
MDR Report Key9758478
MDR Text Key189081818
Report Number3014526664-2020-00040
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NTE
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K153485
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/26/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/26/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/18/2022
Device Model NumberSR-200-NPS
Device Catalogue NumberSR-200-NPS
Device Lot Number300818
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/11/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age71 YR
-
-