Model Number DB-9218-15 |
Device Problems
Structural Problem (2506); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Inadequate Pain Relief (2388); No Code Available (3191)
|
Event Date 02/17/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
A report was received that the ipg was showing two high impedances on two therapeutic contacts, and it was causing inadequate stimulation for the patient.The stimulation was turned off as the physician opened patient up at the head site to test the lead, and pocket site to test the extension and adaptors.Physician assessed one of the adapters was broken.He replaced the broken adaptor with a new one.The patient was doing good post operatively and receiving good stimulation coverage.The device is pending return.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device technical analysis: visual inspection of the returned lead adapter revealed cables # 1 and 2 were fractured after the weld in the distal connector stack.This type of damage typically occurs when excessive tensile force is exerted onto the lead body and connector section of the lead.Bending the distal end could also cause cable fractures in the connector section of the lead.The broken cables are still contained inside the connector.The complaint of high impedances was confirmed through product analysis.The probable cause was traced to component failure correction to initial mdr in fields d4 and b5.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the ipg was showing two high impedances on two therapeutic contacts, and it was causing inadequate stimulation for the patient.The stimulation was turned off as the physician opened patient up at the head site to test the lead, and pocket site to test the extension and adaptors.Physician assessed one of the adapters was broken.He replaced the broken adaptor with a new one.The patient was doing good post operatively and receiving good stimulation coverage.Additional information was received when the device was returned on 07apr2020 that the serial number of the explanted device is (b)(6) and not (b)(6) that was reported in the initial vigilance report.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|