• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH TRIATHLON CR FEM COMP #2 L-CEM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, CO

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH TRIATHLON CR FEM COMP #2 L-CEM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, CO Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 5510F201
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem Weakness (2145)
Event Date 10/03/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
It was noted that the device is not available for evaluation.Should additional information become available, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.Device not returned.
 
Event Description
This pi is for weakness after revision surgery on left knee.Patient called stating she had bilateral knee replacements done on (b)(6) 2019.Her left knee was revised on (b)(6) 2019 due to femoral subsidence.She also mentioned she is experiencing weakness after her revision surgery.Patient stated she is not having issues with her right knee.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Updated product information and contact information.Reported event an event regarding patient factors involving a triathlon femoral component was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results -product evaluation and results: material analysis, visual, functional and dimensional inspections could not be performed as the device remained implanted.-clinician review: a review of the provided medical information by a clinical consultant indicated: "the revision surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2019.The operative report noted that the femoral component was removed using an oscillating saw and moreland osteotome without appreciable bone loss.This implied that the implant was well fixed.The distal femur was recut using an intramedullary guide set to 7°.It was noted that the cut removed more bone medially than laterally which indicated that the preoperative increased valgus angle was being corrected.The rest of the femur was re-cut with a 4 in 1 cutting guide referencing the anterior femoral cortex via 2 static saw blades.The femur was cut to a size #2.A cruciate retaining femoral component had reasonable fit but the implant was cemented due to a concern that some of the bone had been stress shielded and was soft.After the cement hardened, a 14 mm x3 tibial bearing was inserted.The implant sizes were confirmed on the implant sheet provided.No complications were noted.The postoperative x-ray report was read as satisfactory positioning and alignment of prosthetic components with an impression of satisfactory post-op appearance of the left knee.As noted, a postoperative internal medicine consultation was obtained for postoperative management.The physical exam, laboratory exam and physician assessment did not reveal any concerns.The patient's preoperative status and comorbidities were similar to those at her primary procedure.No additional clinical information or postoperative course were provided.However the pi reports indicated dissatisfaction due to due to weakness of the left knee after the revision surgery.Conclusion of assessment: revision of the femoral component was confirmed.One cannot confirm the complaint of post-operative weakness without physical assessment." product history review: a review of the device manufacturing records indicate that all devices accepted into final stock were free from discrepancies.Complaint history review: there has been no other similar event for the lot referenced.Conclusions: it was reported that the patient had weakness after the revision surgery.The available medical records were provided to the consulting clinician for a review which was deemed insufficient to confirm the event.The exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Further information such as postmortem report, return of the device, pathology reports, pre- and post-operative x-rays and the primary operative report as well as patient history and follow-up notes are needed to complete the investigation for determining root cause.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If devices and / or additional information become available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.H3 other text : device not returned.
 
Event Description
This pi is for weakness after revision surgery on left knee patient called stating she had bilateral knee replacements done on (b)(6) 2019.Her left knee was revised on (b)(6) 2019 due to femoral subsidence.She also mentioned she is experiencing weakness after her revision surgery.Patient stated she is not having issues with her right knee.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRIATHLON CR FEM COMP #2 L-CEM
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, CO
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
MDR Report Key9775446
MDR Text Key187013078
Report Number0002249697-2020-00423
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MBH
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K141056
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/30/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/02/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/31/2023
Device Catalogue Number5510F201
Device Lot NumberD676B
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received06/09/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age56 YR
-
-