• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CENTINEL SPINE, LLC. PRODISC C MILLING BIT WITH 2.35MM X 33.5MM SHAFT; BONE-RESECTION ORTHOPAEDIC REAMER, REUSABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CENTINEL SPINE, LLC. PRODISC C MILLING BIT WITH 2.35MM X 33.5MM SHAFT; BONE-RESECTION ORTHOPAEDIC REAMER, REUSABLE Back to Search Results
Model Number 03.820.157
Device Problem Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583)
Patient Problems Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage (1772); Spinal Cord Injury (2432)
Event Date 02/06/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The information provided from the reporter and the centinel rm suggest that medical intervention was required to preclude a serious injury as a result of the milling bit malfunction.The prodisc c implant was replaced with an unknown titanium cage with iliac allograft.The patient has been reported to be recovering ok and was discharged from the facility.The patient was said to be a large individual with hard/dense bone.Dhr review did not identify any anomalies in manufacturing that may have caused or contributed to the malfunction.The risk assessment found that associated risks are identified, mitigated, and determined to be acceptable.Review of previous complaints found the rate of complaints is within allowable limits.No capas have been related to this complaint.Evaluation of the returned broken tip confirmed the malfunction.The shaft/remainder of the instrument was not returned for evaluation.The returned tip was found to be in specification.There is no indication of a device related problem.
 
Event Description
Patient having a prodisc c us implantation at c5-c6.Procedure was performed on (b)(6) 2020.While the surgeon was cutting the keel for the pdc, the prodisc c 1.8mm milling bit broke within the keel cut.The surgeon did not realize the bit broke, and implanted a pdc us xld 5mm implant.The implant pushed the broken tip of the milling bit into the patient's spinal canal causing a dura tear and cerebral spinal fluid leak.Milling bit was located via anterior x-ray imaging.Lateral x-rays appeared normal.The surgeon explanted the pdc device and removed the broken tip from the patient.The dura tear was repaired to stop the csf leak.The patient was showing signs of compartment syndrome and increased pressures; however the pressures started to decrease.The surgeon implanted a titanium cage and allograft in place of the prodisc c device.As of (b)(6) 2020, the patient is doing ok and was discharged.No further details were provided on the patient status.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PRODISC C MILLING BIT WITH 2.35MM X 33.5MM SHAFT
Type of Device
BONE-RESECTION ORTHOPAEDIC REAMER, REUSABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
CENTINEL SPINE, LLC.
900 airport rd, suite 3b
west chester, pa
Manufacturer (Section G)
TECOMET INC.
5307 9th avenue
kenosha, wi
Manufacturer Contact
jason smith
2001 n. congress ave.
riveria beach, FL 33404
8878839
MDR Report Key9823383
MDR Text Key188001324
Report Number3007494564-2020-00014
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GFG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/16/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/12/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number03.820.157
Device Lot Number2019-0398
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/09/2020
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/18/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/14/2019
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age48 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-