Device evaluated by mfr: the device was returned for evaluation.A pusher wire, main coil and introducer sheath were returned for this complaint.The coil and pusher wire arms were not interlocked within introducer sheath.The twist lock of the introducer sheath had been opened.The pusher wire was inspected and no anomalies were noted.The mail coil was returned stretched and kinked.No more damages were found in the returned device.The coil was stuck and exit from the introducer sheath with some resistance.The proximal end has a smooth surface.The interlocking arm was inspected and no anomalies were noted.The zap tip has a smooth surface.The interlocking arm was inspected and no anomalies were noted.Dimensional inspection of the pusher wire and main coil revealed the components were within specification except the number of fiber bundles, which failed to meet specification.
|
Reportable based on device analysis completed on 28feb2020.It was reported that the pusher wire would not advance into the microcatheter.A 6mm x 20cm interlock coil was selected for use.At the course of the procedure, when the physician placed the coil inside a microcatheter, it was noted that the coil would not advance since the pusher wire would not advance into the microcatheter.The coil did not go inside the patient's body.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.No patient complications were reported.However, device analysis revealed that there were missing fiber bundles.
|