BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION WOLVERINE CORONARY CUTTING BALLOON MONORAIL; CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY (PTCA), CUTTING/SCORING
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 3851 |
Device Problem
Break (1069)
|
Patient Problem
No Code Available (3191)
|
Event Date 03/02/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(6).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the catheter shaft broke.The target lesion was located in the severely calcified circumflex artery.A 10mmx3.00mm wolverine coronary cutting balloon was selected for use.During the procedure, after dilatation was performed with a bsc imaging catheter, it was noted that device was able to cross up to the midway of the lesion.A non-bsc guide extension catheter was used in combination.Furthermore, when the device was removed after deflation, resistance was met, so it was tried to expand again and removed, but it failed.After it was tried to remove again forcibly, it was noted that around 10cm of the shaft got separated from the tip of the device.Then, the section from the separated part to the tip was pulled out from the patient's body using a guiding catheter and guide extension in combination.The device was completely removed from the patient's body and the procedure was completed with the original device.No further complications were reported and the patient was good post procedure.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
E1 - initial reporter city: (b)(6).Device evaluated by mfr: the device was returned for analysis.The device was received in two sections as the result of a break in the shaft polymer extrusion.A visual and microscopic examination was performed on the returned device.It was noted that a section of one of the blades, approximately 2mm in length was completely detached from the proximal end of the balloon material.The remaining section of blade was undamaged and fully bonded to the balloon material.The complete pad of the blade remained fully bonded to the balloon material.The detached section of blade was not returned for analysis.The damage identified can potentially be a result of resistance encountered during withdrawal of the device.All other blades were intact and fully bonded to the balloon material.A visual examination identified that the balloon was not folded which indicates that the balloon was subjected to positive pressure.Blood was identified inside the balloon which is an indication of a device leak.The investigator was unable to inflate the balloon due to a detachment of the shaft of the device.A visual examination identified severe damage to the tip of the device.This type of damage is consistent with excessive force being applied to the device when attempting to cross the lesion.A visual and tactile examination found multiple severe kinks to the hypotube of the returned device.This type of damage is consistent with excessive force being applied to the device.A visual and tactile examination found the shaft polymer extrusion to be severely stretched and completely detached at the shaft polymer extrusion to hypotube bond.This type of damage is consistent with excessive tensile force being applied to the device.No other issues were identified during the product analysis.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the catheter shaft broke.The target lesion was located in the severely calcified circumflex artery.A 10mmx3.00mm wolverine coronary cutting balloon was selected for use.During the procedure, after dilatation was performed with a bsc imaging catheter, it was noted that device was able to cross up to the midway of the lesion.A non-bsc guide extension catheter was used in combination.Furthermore, when the device was removed after deflation, resistance was met, so it was tried to expand again and removed, but it failed.After it was tried to remove again forcibly, it was noted that around 10cm of the shaft got separated from the tip of the device.Then, the section from the separated part to the tip was pulled out from the patient's body using a guiding catheter and guide extension in combination.The device was completely removed from the patient's body and the procedure was completed with the original device.No further complications were reported and the patient was good post procedure.It was further reported that there was a possibility that the blade was dislodged inside the guiding catheter when it was removed from the patient's body.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|