• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PROVIDENCE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC. CAVUX CERVICAL CAGE-B; INTERVERTEBRAL FUSION DEVICE WITH BONE GRAFT, CERVICAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PROVIDENCE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC. CAVUX CERVICAL CAGE-B; INTERVERTEBRAL FUSION DEVICE WITH BONE GRAFT, CERVICAL Back to Search Results
Model Number PD-31-200
Device Problem Malposition of Device (2616)
Patient Problem Neck Pain (2433)
Event Date 08/14/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
This event was discovered during discussions with a surgeon who did not perform surgery on the patient.Attempts were made to contact the original surgeon via phone and email with no response received.Patient underwent posterior fusion on (b)(6) 2018 with cervical cages placed posteriorly at c6-c7 and c7-t1.However, c5-c6 and c6-c7 were intended treatment levels.Post procedure, patient complained of right arm pain initiating a ct scan.The ct scan confirmed two of four cervical cages placed posteriorly, at c6-c7 and c7-t1 on the right, were malpositioned and could be contributing to neuritis.On (b)(6) 2018, the surgeon removed one cage at c7-t1 on the right.The cervical cage at c6-c7 was found to be placed deeper than an ideal position and could contribute to right arm pain but the cervical cage at this level was not removed.Patient received an acdf at c6-c7 from another surgeon in 2019.The cervical cage at c6-c7 was not touched at this time.No device defect or malfunction or permanent impairment was reported by either surgeon.The surgeons were not able to be reached for an update on the patient but no other clinical sequelae have been documented.
 
Event Description
Patient underwent posterior fusion on (b)(6) 2018 with cervical cages placed posteriorly at c6-c7 and c7-t1.However, c5-c6 and c6-c7 were intended treatment levels.Post procedure, patient complained of right arm pain initiating a ct scan.The ct scan confirmed two of four cervical cages placed posteriorly, at c6-c7 and c7-t1 on the right, were malpositioned and could be contributing to neuritis.On (b)(6) 2018, the surgeon removed one cage at c7-t1 on the right.The cervical cage at c6-c7 was found to be placed deeper than an ideal position and could contribute to right arm pain but the cervical cage at this level was not removed.Patient received an acdf at c6-c7 from another surgeon in 2019.The cervical cage at c6-c7 was not touched at this time.No device defect or malfunction or permanent impairment was reported by either surgeon.The surgeons were not able to be reached for an update on the patient but no other clinical sequelae have been documented.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CAVUX CERVICAL CAGE-B
Type of Device
INTERVERTEBRAL FUSION DEVICE WITH BONE GRAFT, CERVICAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
PROVIDENCE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
3875 hopyard rd
suite 300
pleasanton, ca
Manufacturer (Section G)
PROVIDENCE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
3875 hopyard rd
suite 300
pleasanton, ca
Manufacturer Contact
ed liou
3875 hopyard rd
suite 300
pleasanton, ca 
5213412
MDR Report Key9908595
MDR Text Key196627492
Report Number3009394448-2020-00002
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code ODP
UDI-Device Identifier00852776006423
UDI-Public00852776006423
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K122801
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/30/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/31/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator No Information
Device Expiration Date06/27/2020
Device Model NumberPD-31-200
Device Catalogue NumberPD-31-200
Device Lot Number046116
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/02/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-