• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION MOSAIC AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, REPLACEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION MOSAIC AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, REPLACEMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number 305U221
Device Problems Calcified (1077); Degraded (1153); Material Puncture/Hole (1504); Material Separation (1562); Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583); Material Twisted/Bent (2981); Mechanics Altered (2984); Naturally Worn (2988); Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
Patient Problems Host-Tissue Reaction (1297); Aortic Valve Stenosis (1717)
Event Date 03/05/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: no product was returned.Conclusion: without the return of the product, no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observation.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that an unknown duration post implant of this bioprosthetic aortic valve, it was explanted and replaced with a non-medtronic device.The reason for replacement was due to stenosis and patient prosthesis mismatch.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: upon receipt at medtronic's quality laboratory, visual examination revealed that all leaflets were slightly twisted and in the closed position.All leaflets were slightly stiff but flexible, which is a normal finding for this valve.An approximately 6mm deterioration resulting in a tear was noted on the lunula of the right cusp near the right/left commissure.Additionally, the tissue on the left cusp margin of attachment was deteriorated, creating a gap between the leaflet and the stent post.Leaflet abrasion resulting in a hole was observed on the lunula of the left cusp.The abrasion appeared to result from contact with the inner outflow rail.The start of a commissure dehiscence was noted on the right/left commissure area with the tissue deterioration on the right and left cusps.The right/non-coronary and left/non-coronary commissures were intact.Remnants of off-white pannus remained attached to the sewing ring.Off-white pannus was noted on the top of the right/non-coronary stent post.An unknown amount of pannus may have been removed during the explant process.Radiography revealed calcification on the right/left and left/non-coronary commissural areas.Conclusions: the device history record was reviewed and showed that this product met all manufacturing specifications for product released for distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.Structural valve deterioration is a known failure mode for bioprosthetic heart valves, especially as the device ages.The stenosis is most likely caused by the pannus, which was confirmed on the returned valve and is often considered a patient-related condition.Pannus is also the likely source of the abrasions.The observed calcification is also considered a patient-related condition.Correction to b5: the valve was replaced 7 years and 1 month post implant.H3: device evaluated? updated h6: coding updated medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MOSAIC AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, REPLACEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
MDR Report Key9927376
MDR Text Key186818145
Report Number2025587-2020-01129
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DYE
UDI-Device Identifier00613994760647
UDI-Public00613994760647
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P990064
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/18/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/06/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/09/2015
Device Model Number305U221
Device Catalogue Number305U221
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/24/2020
Date Manufacturer Received08/21/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age81 YR
Patient Weight95
-
-