• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: POSEIDON MEDICAL, INC. TRYTON SIDE BRANCH STENT; BARE METAL CORONARY STENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

POSEIDON MEDICAL, INC. TRYTON SIDE BRANCH STENT; BARE METAL CORONARY STENT Back to Search Results
Model Number T5-2530-191-US
Device Problem Device Damaged by Another Device (2915)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 01/03/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Patient was 82 or 83 years old.(b)(4).The patient had a bypass (lima) due to the considered potential risk of the retained piece of wire becoming thrombosed due to natural body processes and thus increasing the risk of myocardial infarction and subsequent necrosis.Event categorized as loss of guidewire position and unable to withdraw guidewire.No device problem found in analysis of production records or trend analysis.Device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, no findings were available."medium" calcification was reported.Vessels that have "moderate to severe calcification" are contraindicated in the ifu.The medium calcification is unlikely to have contributed to the reported issue.Production records and trend analysis were reviewed with no device problem found.Because the device was not available for testing, a definitive conclusion could not be reached.Tryton medical inc.Transferred ownership of pma p150039 to poseidon medical inc.As of september 30, 2019 and notified fda via p150039/a05.Both poseidon medical, as the pma holder, and tryton medical, as manufacturer, are obligated to submit mdrs for any qualifying events with the tryton side branch stent.Poseidon medical had to wait for the assignment of their establishment registration number to be able to submit mdrs, which is why poseidon is submitting this mdr late (over 30 days after aware date).However, this mdr was submitted by tryton medical on time, within 30 days of becoming aware of the event.Refer to tryton mdr number 3007210870-2020-0001.
 
Event Description
The physician successfully deployed the 2.5/3.0mm x 19mm tryton coronary stent & 3.0x20 mm elunir stents into the diagonal (tryton) and lad (elunir).There was no reported patient injury.The physician was in the process of repositioning the non-cordis.014 wire, when the distal end of the wire caught onto the proximal strut of the stent.The physician tried to remove the wire, but it wouldn't come loose.They proceeded to use a balloon and dotter the wire hoping it would come loose, but that didn't work.They then proceeded to use a snare to retrieve the wire, but the snare became stuck.They proceeded to remove the guide, snare, and wire, after the snare became caught.There was approximately 15mm of the wire still wrapped around the strut.The patient was stable though out the procedure.The physician thought it would be best to have the patient undergo a bypass (lima), because the wire will thrombus in the future.It was reported that the patient was stable after the surgery.The target lesion was left anterior descending (lad) and second diagonal.The medina classification was 1,1,1.The percent of mv (main vessel) and sb (side branch) stenosis was 60-80%.The device was not used for a chronic total occlusion (cto).The degree of calcification/tortuosity was medium.The guide catheter size was 7fr.The device was prepped normally and was able to maintain negative pressure.There was no resistance/friction while inserting the balloon through the rotating hemostatic valve and through the guide catheter.The predilatation was performed prior to attempting to place the tryton stent.The physician predilated the diagonal and main branch.There was no difficulty reaching the lesion.The tryton sailed into the diagonal with no resistance.There was only one dilatation performed during the attempt to place the tryton stent.The tryton stent was not removed between dilatations.Only one tryton device was attempted during the procedure.The other additional procedural details were requested but were unknown.Procedural complication in this case refers to the guidewire becoming trapped on an implanted stent and the tip being separated and left behind in the patient's coronary vasculature, thus requiring surgery to bypass the vessel.The surgery was decided upon due to the considered potential risk of the retained piece of wire becoming thrombosed due to natural body processes and thus increasing the risk of myocardial infarction and subsequent necrosis.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRYTON SIDE BRANCH STENT
Type of Device
BARE METAL CORONARY STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
POSEIDON MEDICAL, INC.
1125 nw 132nd avenue
pembroke pines, fl
Manufacturer (Section G)
POSEIDON MEDICAL, INC.
1125 nw 132nd avenue
pembroke pines, fl
Manufacturer Contact
elizabeth lavelle
1125 nw 132nd ave
pembroke pines, fl 
6550391
MDR Report Key9946880
MDR Text Key198526913
Report Number3016248656-2020-00001
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MAF
UDI-Device Identifier00894588002132
UDI-Public00894588002132
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P150039
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type other
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/06/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/09/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/18/2021
Device Model NumberT5-2530-191-US
Device Catalogue NumberT5-2530-191-US
Device Lot NumberUBC19D1000
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/06/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/19/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
-
-