Product complaint # (b)(4).Since the product was not returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted and no determination of possible contributing factors could be made.Device history record (dhr) review cannot be conducted because no lot number was provided by the customer.Missing information from this report is identified as blank; this information was not provided in the reported event or available at the time of report submission. information regarding patient weight, height, medical history, race, and ethnicity was not reported.Cerenovus manufacturer's report numbers: 1226348-2020-00036 are related to the same incident.
|
This complaint is from a literature source.As reported in the literature publication entitled, ¿effect of evaluation of enterprise stents in the treatment of complex and severe symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis¿.1 patient with middle cerebral artery stenosis who underwent treatment with enterprise stent died of a cerebral hemorrhage after the operation objective: to evaluate the safety and efficacy of using enterprise stents for the treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis.Objective: from january 2012 to august 2018, the clinical and imaging data of 42 consecutive patients with complex and severe symptomatic icas received enterprise stenting due to ineffective drug treatment were analyzed retrospectively.
|
Udi - (b)(4).Perforator was received for evaluation.Dhr- there is no indication that the production process may have contributed to this complaint failure analysis- the product was visually inspected with heavy organic matter, torn label and bone dust noted.Instruction for use testing and functional test was found to perform as intended.Complaint could not be verified.The perforator met all applicable acceptance criteria and tested to specifications.The root cause cannot be determined given the functional testing found the 261221 perforator met all applicable acceptance criteria.In addition, no issues relevant to the failure were noted from the dhr review, or trending, and proper finished goods testing was performed prior to release.Between 05nov2019 and 30jun2020, approximately 2,200 mdrs submitted electronically by integra lifesciences via trackwise, integra's complaint handling system, were not received by cdrh due to a computer system issue.Within this time period, an error with integra's middleware, which facilitates communications between trackwise and the fda system, caused the complaint records to close and indicate we had received an acknowledgement 3 from the fda when we had not.Integra interpreted the acknowledgement as a successful submission; however, subsequent investigation revealed the acknowledgement 3 received was from our middleware and not from the fda (these acknowledgements have been retained as part of the documentation of the mdr).The malfunction was related to the relocation of the trackwise application to a new data center during the transition of integra's corporate headquarters from plainsboro, nj to princeton, nj.Previously, integra had been successfully receiving acknowledgements 1, 2, and 3 from the fda, and our records reflect these acknowledgements, including the date and time stamps.Capa pr (b)(64 and nc 20-011 have been opened by integra to further investigate the nonconformance and develop a corrective action plan.The middleware error has been corrected, and integra has filed mdrs since the correction and verified that the appropriate acknowledgements have been received from the fda.Integra is resubmitting all impacted mdr reports for the time period 05nov2019 through 30jun2020.Integra lifesciences contacted (b)(6), director of regulatory programs, office of product evaluation and quality and (b)(6), assistant director, mdr team, office of product evaluation and quality on july 8-9, 2020 to report these issues regarding mdr reports.
|