• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ZOLL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION LIFEVEST WCD 4000 SYSTEM; WEARABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ZOLL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION LIFEVEST WCD 4000 SYSTEM; WEARABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number WCD 4000
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Syncope (1610); Death (1802)
Event Date 03/01/2020
Event Type  Death  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluation of monitor sn (b)(4) has been completed.  the reported problem (patient death) was confirmed.  during the incoming functional testing, a 1hz simulated normal sinus rhythm signal was applied to the monitor, followed by a 5hz simulated treatable arrhythmia signal which verified proper performance of the detection algorithm.During the transition to the 5hz signal, the device was confirmed to properly enter into a treatment sequence which includes a verification of the audio messaging and siren alarms, as well as a test of the pulse delivery circuitry.The pulse delivery circuitry test verified proper charging of the high voltage capacitors and proper delivery of five full energy 150j biphasic pulses.The functional testing confirmed proper response button functionality, ecg acquisition, detection algorithm performance, and pulse delivery functionality.  there is no indication of a product malfunction.Electrode belt sn (b)(4) has not been recovered from the field.Device evaluation included review of downloaded software flag files on the day of the event.The review of the software flags consisted of an analysis of the downloaded data to identify any fault flags or unusual patterns of software flags.The software flag files did not suggest a device malfunction.Device manufacturer date: monitor: 05/09/2019, electrode belt: 03/05/2019.
 
Event Description
A us distributor contacted zoll to report that a patient passed away on (b)(6) 2020, while wearing the lifevest.The patient's wife, sister, and brother in law were with the patient prior to passing.It was reported that the passing was cardiac related.It was reported that paramedics may have unplugged the lifevest.It was reported that the patient was not feeling well, 911 was called and the patient passed out.It was reported that the paramedics attempted resuscitation efforts.It was also reported that the patient experienced an appropriate treatment event consisting of 2 shocks.At 13:13:34 on (b)(6) 2020 the patient received an appropriate treatment.The patient's rhythm at the time of the treatment was ventricular tachycardia (vt) at 180 bpm and the post shock rhythm was sinus bradycardia at 35 bpm with motion artifact.At 13:18:25, the patient received a second appropriate treatment.The patient's rhythm at the time of the treatment was fine vf with possible cpr/motion artifact and the post shock rhythm was a sinus tachycardia with motion artifact.The patient's arrhythmia was successfully converted to a slower rhythm as a result of the treatment event.The patient's rhythm was ventricular fibrillation (vf) with cpr/motion artifact at 13:19:26.The patient received a non-lifevest defibrillation at 13:22:05.Cpr/motion artifact prevented the lifevest from treating the patient from 13:19:26 to 13:28:11.The patient was in asystole with cpr/motion artifact at the time of the electrode belt disconnection at 13:33:42 on (b)(6) 2020.The response buttons not were pressed during the event.The patient passed on (b)(6) 2020 at approximately 1:40pm.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluation of monitor sn (b)(4) has been completed.  the reported problem (patient death) was confirmed.  during the incoming functional testing, a 1hz simulated normal sinus rhythm signal was applied to the monitor, followed by a 5hz simulated treatable arrhythmia signal which verified proper performance of the detection algorithm.During the transition to the 5hz signal, the device was confirmed to properly enter into a treatment sequence which includes a verification of the audio messaging and siren alarms, as well as a test of the pulse delivery circuitry.The pulse delivery circuitry test verified proper charging of the high voltage capacitors and proper delivery of five full energy 150j biphasic pulses.The functional testing confirmed proper response button functionality, ecg acquisition, detection algorithm performance, and pulse delivery functionality.  there is no indication of a product malfunction.Electrode belt sn (b)(4) has not been recovered from the field.Device evaluation included review of downloaded software flag files on the day of the event.The review of the software flags consisted of an analysis of the downloaded data to identify any fault flags or unusual patterns of software flags.The software flag files did not suggest a device malfunction.Device manufacturer date monitor: 05/09/2019.Electrode belt: 03/05/2019.
 
Event Description
A us distributor contacted zoll to report that a patient passed away on (b)(6) 2020, while wearing the lifevest.The patient's wife, sister, and brother in law were with the patient prior to passing.It was reported that the passing was cardiac related.It was reported that paramedics may have unplugged the lifevest.It was reported that the patient was not feeling well, 911 was called and the patient passed out.It was reported that the paramedics attempted resuscitation efforts.It was also reported that the patient experienced an appropriate treatment event consisting of 2 shocks.At 13:13:34 on (b)(6) 2020 the patient received an appropriate treatment.The patient's rhythm at the time of the treatment was ventricular tachycardia (vt) at 180 bpm and the post shock rhythm was sinus bradycardia at 35 bpm with motion artifact.At 13:18:25, the patient received a second appropriate treatment.The patient's rhythm at the time of the treatment was fine vf with possible cpr/motion artifact and the post shock rhythm was a sinus tachycardia with motion artifact.The patient's arrhythmia was successfully converted to a slower rhythm as a result of the treatment event.The patient's rhythm was ventricular fibrillation (vf) with cpr/motion artifact at 13:19:26.The patient received a non-lifevest defibrillation at 13:22:05.Cpr/motion artifact prevented the lifevest from treating the patient from 13:19:26 to 13:28:11.The patient was in asystole with cpr/motion artifact at the time of the electrode belt disconnection at 13:33:42 on (b)(6) 2020.The response buttons not were pressed during the event.The patient passed on (b)(6) 2020 at approximately 1:40pm.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LIFEVEST WCD 4000 SYSTEM
Type of Device
WEARABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
ZOLL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION
121 gamma drive
pittsburgh, pa
Manufacturer (Section G)
ZOLL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION
121 gamma drive
pittsburgh, pa
Manufacturer Contact
rachel mahoney
121 gamma drive
pittsburgh, pa 
9683333
MDR Report Key9991324
MDR Text Key191483384
Report Number3008642652-2020-03554
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MVK
UDI-Device Identifier00855778005005
UDI-Public00855778005005
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P010030
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/23/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/23/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model NumberWCD 4000
Device Catalogue Number10A0988
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/24/2020
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received04/15/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/09/2019
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
Patient Age67 YR
-
-