• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ENFIT ENTERAL FEEDING CONNECTION; ENFIT FEEDING TUBE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ENFIT ENTERAL FEEDING CONNECTION; ENFIT FEEDING TUBE Back to Search Results
Device Problem Connection Problem (2900)
Patient Problem Stomach Ulceration (4488)
Event Date 12/28/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The event- involves the enfit enteral feeding connection and enfit feeding tube.It is designed to reduce the number of missed connections.However, the connection does not pull away from the peg tube if tension is detected thus causing the peg to pull against the abdominal wall.This can cause dislodgement and harm to the patient.The patient then requires additional intervention/procedures to correct any potential or actual harm.This patient's peg was lodged in the anterior abdominal wall and pulling stomach up into it.There was also a large ulceration noted in the stomach caused by the peg.Fda safety report id# (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENFIT ENTERAL FEEDING CONNECTION
Type of Device
ENFIT FEEDING TUBE
MDR Report Key11444793
MDR Text Key239108787
Report NumberMW5099863
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FPD
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Voluntary
Reporter Occupation Risk Manager
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/05/2021
2 Devices were Involved in the Event: 1   2  
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/08/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No Information
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age48 YR
-
-